Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: chat

Mum has to subsidise contact for her child with her rapist

14 replies

Willowowisp · 20/06/2021 15:28

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9705531/Mother-appeals-against-family-court-ruling-saying-subsidise-former-partner-child.html

Words fail me

OP posts:
Clickbait · 20/06/2021 15:29

That fucking stinks

AlexaShutUp · 20/06/2021 15:31

I haven't clicked on the link because DM, but your thread title says enough. Sickening.

Willowowisp · 20/06/2021 15:41

It is an absolutely shocking story. Poor woman. Too often women are made responsible for abusive and dangerous men.

OP posts:
UppityPuppity · 20/06/2021 15:45

How the hell??!!

FemaleAndLearning · 20/06/2021 15:50

The family courts are a disgrace. They honestly think the rapists should see that child let alone make the victim pay him to do that.

blublub · 20/06/2021 15:59

From my experience with the family court system it doesn’t surprise me. The whole thing needs major reform.

ArabellaScott · 20/06/2021 16:09

Shocking. I hadn't realised these things happened until I started reading more on MN about it. Appalling, for both women and children.

BlackeyedSusan · 20/06/2021 16:13

for those who did not click.

the woman is having to pay half the cost of a contact centre and member of staff so that contact goes ahead with her rapist

BlackeyedSusan · 20/06/2021 16:15

despite the judge deciding that she was the victim of domestic rape.

Queenoftheashes · 20/06/2021 16:20

I didn’t see a rationale.
He is the rapist and the reason a contact centre is required. She has done nothing to warrant the bill.

NameChange2PostThis · 20/06/2021 16:32

@AlexaShutUp

I haven't clicked on the link because DM, but your thread title says enough. Sickening.
The DM is one of the few places in MSM that reports on this kind of woman-hating legal decision and highlights the misogyny of family courts. I am very happy to click on their links and support their advertisers.

This case is horrible - but sadly not shocking. I hope the decision is overturned. It is high time family court case decisions were subject to public scrutiny - too many abusers are being protected in the name of safeguarding.

PicsInRed · 20/06/2021 16:40

I'm not remotely surprised. The Children Act needs to be torn down and rebuilt from the foundations up.

ChickenNugget11 · 20/06/2021 17:15

Not surprising. Much like the Rochdale teenage trafficking gang, one of them petitioned to have access to a child he gathered through abusing those young girls.

Willowowisp · 20/06/2021 18:09

That makes my blood run cold.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page