Hi, I'm after some opinions. I am probably just being silly because I am on maternity leave and my brain is understimulated.
I am a psychologist and had a recent experience of birth trauma. My LO is now 3m, after birth he spent some time in NICU. I am coping well now, but it wasn't easy.
Since then I have spoken to so many mums who have shared their difficulties with me around adjusting to motherhood, anxiety, mood, and trauma around pregnancy and birth. Hardly anyone has sought / had mental health support.
Coincidentally I also delivered a trauma therapy session at a women's retreat recently and LOVED it - all guests got so much better over the course of it and it felt really healing and empowering. I wished all those mums could feel that way.
It got me thinking it would be cool to have a retreat for mums specifically around trauma / mood / anxiety / adjustment to motherhood - but would anyone go without their babies? I'd have loved a break for a couple of nights and would have been happy so long as there was somewhere to pump (like a NICU style pumping room). I just feel the retreat wouldn't be as therapeutic with the demands of the baby there.
Obviously I recognise this may exclude some people - eg those who don't have a partner, or who breastfeed and don't express, etc. But my thought was to start simple with a retreat just for the women and if it all goes well then I could always do one for women plus babies (and support person on site), as this would be logistically a lot more challenging to set up.
Or would someone a bit further down the line, baby slightly older, still be interested in attending something like this or is the issue sort of buried by then?
Or the whole thing might just be a silly idea, I don't know.