Op I didn't get the rush of love with my first born either , and actually up to the age of 5 I didn't really enjoy being around her .
That doesn't mean I wasn't a good mum to her in those difficult years .
Sometimes it take years to bond fully with your child , and as long as your still meeting the child's needs and being kind then don't worry about it . The bond will eventually come .
Sometimes it's just a gradual thing that creeps up when your not noticing , I think the " rush of love " is the expected reaction to seeing your newborn , but I honestly think that more women say they have it when they don't .
I think if you think about how you fell in love with your Dh/dp , only a few would insist they had the "love at first sight ,struck by lightning bolt" type . Most lasting relationships have the slow start , I know mother -child love is of course different to a couples love , but love is love so why can't a slow start mother child bond be as widely accepted as " normal " ? .
I think a lot more women would be more honest if there wasn't this stupid idea that anything less than instant adoration isn't good enough .
For what it's worth when my oldest was born , my first thought was " FFs , they not even cleaned it , it's covered in goo/blood "
That tiny goo covered screaming " it" , is now my bright ,beautiful almost 17 year old , and seriously she's the dogs bollocks ....one of my favourite people ever , and I marvel at how good our bond is now .
Funny thing also , with each baby after her " the bond " came a bit quicker . The only one I had " the rush " with was dd4 , and I think it was because she was born in her caul and was silent after a dodgy labour ( distress , twins, ventouse then forceps) and we thought she had died ..when we were told she was ok I got the rush . I think it was relief that she was ok and fear that she had gone that caused it ...I don't think it was a " normal" reaction to a birth for me .