Ah thanks so much - I get it now. The questionnaire I saw must have been the ESA 50 as my friend's son has been on IB for many years. He has been put on JSA which isn't surprising as his main problem is drink. Apparently he scored 0 out of 15. I read recently that the coalition's new idea is that anyone with drink/drug problems will have to agree to a treatment plan and if they refuse, their benefits will cease. I can see that to pay IB for many years to people with drink/drug problems doesn't seem fair, although there is usually an underlying reason for the problem in the first place, but this would be impossible to assess. IF the treatment plan (not sure that term was used) is a comprehensive residential plan with good follow up care, then it might be a good idea. However I am pretty sure that it will be nothing like that and will be something very superficial, and organised by someone who doesn't have any idea of the difficulty of withdrawal from drink/drugs. Also as I'm sure you are aware many people "self medicate" their mental illness with drink/non prescribed drugs which makes things worse of course.
As you say summer this whole thing is fundamentally flawed and final decisions being made by civil servants at the DWP I think is horrendous.
Going off the point a bit but my specialism if social services was fostering & adoption. Applicants had to have a medical, carried out by their own GP, who would complete a form and send it to the medical officer of health for the county council, who made a decision on the applicant's suitability (or not) to foster or adopt. The notion that the GPs report would be sent back to a social worker (without any medical qualifications) to make the final decision is ridiculous, yet this seems to be what is happening with these WCTs.
I have read something about IDSs big plan about "universal credit" but thus far I have been unable to understand how it will work.
Thank you for your kind words about how I might be helpful as a volunteer. I am seeing a psychologist on the NHS and we have been talking about my loss of confidence since my last episode of severe depression and the fact that it ebbs and flows. She has said that I would make a very good advocate because I am articulate and would be capable of understanding the relevant issue. She has also asked if I would consider being on a panel organised by the Hospital Trust - E for E (experts by experience) and whilst I am in agreement with the principle, I am ambivalent of wanting any more contact with the mental health service at the hospital where I was an inpatient.
I have however given some very detailed notes to the psychologist about the shortfalls on the ward (it was for older people as I was 66 at the time of admission) The psychologist is hoping to improve services on the older peoples' wards as her specialism is related to older people. She told me that she had concerns about the ward and would appreciate patients giving feedback. I think for me the most worrying thing that nothing had changed between my first 3 month stay in 1995 (following the death of my closest friend) and this next 3 month stay some 15 years later in 2010. Apparently the ward manager is keen on improving services, so that is a good start.
However I will think of applying to CAB and I have thought of volunteering in other ways, but feel that I would like to use some of the skills that I attained in my long career in social services, and I thought something like Samaritans or CAB might be more relevant.
However I will look at the web site you have provided. Many thanks.
I am involved with meeting my grandchildren from school once or twice a week when I am ok, but would like more of a focus to my life and would want to be of help to the most disadvantaged people in our society, who this coalition is intent on making their lives more and more disadvantaged.
Thanks again NNx