I’m generally a fan of “full fact” and similar but even reading their response does not reassure me that the long term plan isn’t to be able to do away with the current Uk law on such matters and being no longer held to EU law either standards lowering so that the wealthy (and powerful) can indeed change tax law in their favour.
So that’s not so much a rebuttal as “well that’s not how it is AT THE MOMENT and the people pointing this out were a bit vague and over simplified things” not that it can’t/won’t happen.
Surely they’re not stupid enough to actually SHOW their cards on this BEFORE we’re out of the eu and prove their critics right? Even if they’d possibly get away with it.
People in the UK are understandably quite attached to high food standards, and to having accurate labelling information. All the shilling in the world is very unlikely to make this a vote winning policy for the Tories. hear hear!
From a BRIEF google, it appears that for the non-English Uk countries it MAY be possible to protect some standards as public health and indirectly through that food safety could possibly be considered a devolved matter.
Certainly here in Scotland we have our own food standards agency, maybe northern Englanders will start shopping in southern Scotland shops?
And the particular elements of food safety being discussed here are devolved matters - labelling etc
As for the appalling LACK of real journalism in the Uk today - I barely have words! Thank fuck for sm actually (with all its faults, at least it doesn’t try its damnedest to hide things which it doesn’t suit the great and powerful for us to know!)