Bcf fe benefits system and it originally focusing on food first.
We need to take into consideration how the benefits system sits along side housing costs (and availability).
If you look at historical trends food used to represent a much higher percentage of household out goings with housing comparitively cheap
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42735294
As this has changed and the middle classes in particular end up by comparison less well off in terms of how much money they have in disposable as so much ends up tied up in property.
We have a much higher percentage of middle class households with expectations to match. The demographics have tilted towards the middle class.
We also have people encouraged to take on greater debt than ever before which leads to greater economic stability overall, will little to no incentive to be prudent.
The benefits system only works if housing is available otherwise you do get the situation where some households are working more and end up with less disposal income than one where no one works under certain circumstances because of how much housing is costing. And because no house building project is being done to match demand and private rentals are effectively more expensive than any other time in the last 100 years.
And of course because so much has been invested by middle class british in owning their own home, few people who own wish for more houses to be built near them or it will devalue their own asset.
The balance between the cost of food and housing is the issue and driver of resentment and sense of unfairness.
The two must walk hand in hand to disasspate