www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/29/sage-minutes-reveal-how-uk-advisers-reacted-to-coronavirus-crisis
It says Public Health England could cope with “five new cases a week (requiring isolation of 800 contacts)”, with potential capacity to increase to 50 new cases and 8,000 contact isolations.
Wtf.
How many new cases a week are we having? It's currently running at about 2000. That have been confirmed
I'm not going mad am I? The above figures suggest about 160 contact isolations per new case. That works out at 320,000 contact isolations per day at current rates. That's right isn't it?
How is that even going to be feasible?
This meeting concludes that “transmission is under way in the community” and that modelling suggests “the UK is 10-14 weeks from the epidemic peak if no mitigations are introduced”. It hears that the UK could have up to 10,000 cases already, and is about four to five weeks behind Italy.
This was way off the mark. An admission made just three days later by SAGE that the situation was far worse than we realised. (We ended up tracking at more like 10 days behind Italy.)
The 10th March meeting is key in that it says
There is also an acknowledgment of the looming crisis to come in care homes. “Sage advised that special policy consideration be given to care homes and various types of retirement communities.”
There was no specific policy given to care homes for weeks and weeks after this date.
On the 1st May Sage discusses the test-and-trace system and agrees “that at least 80% of contacts of an index case would need to be contacted for a system to be effective”.
^“For the test-and-trace system to be effective, isolation of contacts of individuals with Covid-19 within 48 hours was desirable.
“The aim should be to develop the capability to test index cases in less than 24 hours … It is considered essential that this testing capability is reached before the autumn/winter flu season when a large number of those reporting symptoms may not have Covid-19.”^
We know we are no where near that point and questions on this have been dodged by Johnson this week. Media need to focus on this...
On 5th May Sage says relaxing lockdown measures should not happen until new cases have dropped to a low level – not on a fixed date.
So the Government ultimately go for a fixed date...
There are lots of unanswered and somewhat disturbing questions here...
I also note the following
Preliminary results of a study indicate that “the virus decays rapidly when exposed to artificial sunlight”.
It notes some rare symptoms or complications that are emerging, including “cerebrovascular events, renal disease and systemic endothelial and organ dysfunction. Also notes longer term health problems, including “extreme tiredness and shortness of breath for months.”
So if we hadn't had the sunniest spring on record this would be loads worse.
And there's a lot more concern about long term effects than we realise.
Certainly it's very arguable that we are ready for lockdown to be relaxed and even more arguable that track and trace is for purpose. We know that its not due to be fully operational until the end of June (where are we going to be with the number of cases and contacts by that point?!) and given the government's track record on operational deadlines slipping, I'd say end of June was on the optimist side.