Peter Foster @pmdfoster
So. The UK's negotiating mandate is out, setting terms for future UK-EU partnership....livelihoods depend on all this, so here's the crazy part - the government admits it will do the economic assessments after the fact - see Para 12 1/Thread
Crazy, because you'd think that the government might have "invited contributions" before emarking on this journey.
I now understand from source, there will be NO IMPACT ASSESSMENTS... /2
Which perhaps isn't that surprising, since we know from the October 2018 assessments that were forced out of the @theresa_may government, they are all negative.
This is NOT about relitigation of #Brexit. It is about taking an 'evidence-based' approach, about listening. /3
Of late, I have spent a lot of time talking to business groups - across all the sectors - and the groups, all with different issues, share one thing in common. A quiet, seething, livid rage. They fizz with frustration. It is quite remarkable to behold. /4
I still don't really understand why the Conservative, the alleged party of business, is so content to become the party of "f*ck business", to borrow a phrase - and why they don't fear the reputational risk more, or the impact on their new 'red wall' votebank. /5
Today, I've been watching the official statesments of business and lobby groups drop into my inbox. These are the official, chlorine-washed versions of what they feel able to say....so here are a few. The 'red' highlights are obviously my own. /6
Let's start with shipping, at random. It just came first. We need to protect value of trade with close partners, we are not convinced UK govt negotiatiors *recognises this reality".
Do I need to decode that statement? WILL YOU PEOPLE LISTEN TO US? /7
Let's stick with transtport, see what Aviation groups ADS says?
We need "pragmatic arrangements" ...we are "disappointed" the govt is not seeking more ambitious approach to aviation safety, says policy director @cullasys Disappointed. /8
More to follow...