We should be talking about this potential war because as pointed out:
Nick Robinson*@bbcnickrobinson*
Reality check. Chances of military action over Gibraltar = close to nil. Chances of military action over N Korean nukes = significant
At least Trump says the US will go it alone.
The selective nature of things is funny isn't it.
Law and Policy*@Law*andpolicy
"We support Gibraltar's self-determination."
- Thanks, we want to stay in EU, by 96%.
"No, not that sort. But can we invade Spain yet?"
(((Tim O'Connor)))*@timoconnorbl*
Quick note: the EU Council Negotiation Document does not threaten sovereignty over Gibraltar. It doesn't even use the word "sovereignty". It simply states any extension of any future UK-EU deals to cover Gibraltar would require the consent of Spain. In respect of any FTA, which requires unanimity, it's not much more than stating what would be a given anyway. But the hysterical reaction in the UK IS important, for several reasons.
First, it further confirms they're blindsided by the predictable.
Second, it shows the either don't know, or don't care, what the documents actually say, and will leap to over-reaction regardless.
And third, when legislators leap in to fuel this nonsense further, it confirms that these are afactual people, hag-ridden by hacks.
All of which, together, act as a very serious warning that these may very well be people with whom one just cannot make any sensible deal. Because, unlike the U.K. side, the EU side ARE serious people who pay attention and know the facts. And this will not be impressing anyone.
Addendum: Gibraltar is also a future issue. NI is a right-this-moment one being utterly ignored for fever-dreams of empire. That's worrying.
Ciarán McGonagle*@cpmcgonagle*
Some thoughts/a rant on the UK's stated ambition to become a global leader in free trade in the context of the events of the past 4 days. As experts consistently point out, global trend in trade has been away from unilateral trade deals and toward regional trade frameworks. Obviously unilateral trade deals in vogue at the moment. Trump seems keen due to his misunderstanding of trade imbalances in geo-politics
Of course, there may come a point where this may change. Far-sighted, sensible and experienced policy makers will be paying close attention. I wonder how the UK can ever expect/hope to become a "global leader" in free trade given the past 4 days, much less the past 40 years?
UK at risk of become perceived as an irrational actor. Former high-ranking officials threatening war at merest provocation is beyond parody. Using security cooperation & EU citizens, whether explicitly or implicitly, as bargaining chips to secure preferential trade is astonishing. Very little that UK has done in past 40 yrs suggests movement beyond old Empire thinking. Govt demonstrably ignorant of how the EU operates.
For 40 yrs, successive Govts, spurred on by media, have peddled lies & nonsense about EU to distract from their failed domestic policies. Trade is based on mutual respect, a shared vision and compromise. On what basis could the UK ever purport to lead the world in trade?
Not Simon Tam*@uncriticalsimon*
Trade is, fundamentally, political. Technical standards, who you trade with - it's all tied up with politics.
The truth is, that remainers might piss off leavers with their 'pessimism', but in failing to listen to remainers, the government are missing using a key asset available to them which might help us get a good deal.
Anyway, this nutjobbery appears to not just be a new thing, but a British trait:
www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/hard-brexit-article-50-archives-britain-blow-up-channel-tunnel-nuclear-bomb-a7662711.html
Super-hard Brexit: how Britain planned to blow up the Channel Tunnel with a nuclear bomb
The history of the Channel Tunnel, incorporating 200 years of Eurosceptic fearmongering and including plans, uncovered by The Independent,for the hardest Brexit of all – destruction by nuclear bomb – has fascinating echoes for today