Thank you for replying Captain.
Well, Mango, I think it was foolish because it wrecks the economy, destroys academic funding and research, takes jobs and investment out of the country and jeopardises a lot of very important employment rights.
None of these things are set in stone yet.
Economy: Heading for a dip regardless.
Academic funding & research destroyed: Is this proven and tangible?
Jobs & investment out of the country: Not yet known for certain the outcome.
Jeopardises employment rights: which ones specifically? How?
I think the gullibility came from believing in Boris Johnson who has immediately crumbled, making it clear he had no faith in what he was saying himself.
Do you think that all 17+ million voters believed or believed in Boris Johnson?
Do you really believe that Boris Johnson was even a factor in many people's vote?
The prejudice - see Farage's racist poster. Undeniably, some people voted Leave based on racism and prejudice. We can argue over how many but it's a fact that some were motivated by this.
Farage's poster was denounced unequivocally by all but a particularly horrible minority.
Do you think that over 17 million people backed his poster & were driven by racism & prejudice?
Don't you dare pretend that no one believed the £350 million to the NHS claim - yes, the dishonesty was pointed out but again, a proportion of Leave voters genuinely believed this and have expressed their disappointment on discovering that it was not true on Friday.
I concede that a proportion of Leave voters may have been swayed by this, but it was repeatedly debunked on all forms of media.
Do you believe that a majority of Leave voters actually believed this figure?
The belief that they were sticking it to the man was misguided; a vote against the EU was not a one against the elite. Look at the people in charge of Leave and tell me they don't represent the 'establishment'.
Do you think that 'the man' was just the politicians?
Do you accept that a large proportion of working class & disaffected, disenfranchised people were making a last ditch attempt to be heard by more than just politicians?
Yes, of course the slogans were effective. Why do you think people spend millions of pounds on advertising and slogans if it doesn't work? Not everyone thought that hard about their vote - some people were indeed convinced by slogans.
I accept the slogan was genius.
But do you not agree that the very reason it worked so well was because it absolutely tapped into the mood and desperate feeling of the long ignored?
Reckless - some people just wanted a change without considering what the consequences might be. That's reckless in my opinion.
What proportion of voters do you think may have voted purely through recklessness?
Enough to sway the vote the other way?