It is nice to read a post from a moderate leaver. There's another live post at the moment on the March where the OP has a very nasty tone.
The truth is the country is split down the middle. I am a passionate remainer, and my view is that I think a lot of people voted to protest their lot generally, rather than against the EU. Which was fair enough, as frankly their lot did not sound great to me. However, if they thought the Eu was responsible for a lot of their ills, then they were misled. It's the elected lot in the House of Commons who forgot about them, and abandoned those cities and towns.
In my job, I already know of a lot of inward investment into the UK being cancelled or postponed. The FTSE 100 doesn't reflect that: the 100 are companies with global footprints. They may be listed here, but they are not as exposed to UK risk. I also know that when we talk about being "nimble" to compete, it's code for reduced employment rights - the ability to hire and fire. So I am truly worried about our future as a nation.
But apparently if I express that, it's indicative of my sour grapes and that my side lost, and I'm talking the country down!
I feel people are hardening into personalities of "I'm a Leaver/Remainer". This can't be a zero sum game where the winner takes all, as we all have to live together.
The Daily Mail is encouraging this divisiveness. Already I see the Mail pivoting to blame "Remoaners" for what I (consistent with my beliefs) believe is the inevitable consequence of Brexit. The divisions they are creating and nurturing might take a generation to undo.
We have never needed sensible leadership more badly, and we have never been more disappointed with the two main political parties. If we have to exit then a soft exit is best. A hard exit will hurt very badly the people who voted for it most.
It sounds silly, but frankly we as a family can leave the UK if we wish. We can live in a number of countries. It's the people who can't leave that I am worried about.