@SeriouslyAgain what’s happening to your daughter is unforgivable, and it’s a desperate situation for you. Remember everything I’m arguing is in genuine terms, and I’m in no way saying that the balance of resources is right.
It's possible I won't feel like this when I'm old, but I don't think it's unreasonable to use 'most likely to benefit', partly based on age, as a pro or con for medical interventions. Very reasonable to use “most likely to benefit”. Not happy about including age in that unless there is good evidence that age in itself affects the effectiveness.
the nhs rations resources but why do they go to people at the end of life rather than the beginning? They don’t always. Look at the waiting lists for knee replacements and cataract operations.
But rather than saying “you’re too old to waste money on, we need the money for younger people”, why on earth don’t we change our whole way of looking at medicine and put far more emphasis on quality of life and independent life, rather than on length of life? It is worth investing in 70 and 80 year-olds - they provide childcare and are the backbone of voluntary services. But many of us on this board are saying “I don’t want to be lingering with dementia” - so why on earth do we do it?