We have been living abroad as part of a 4yr work placement, and we are choosing (yes, choosing!) to come back to the UK as we miss friends and family. I have two DC. I was discussing that I had seen a nice Surrey town we would like to settle in, and my friend, who appears to have become the biggest school snob in the world, has said that we are nuts for not choosing the school first, and then the location. As she is self employed, she has managed to hide a lot of her income and get 100% bursaries for her children at top schools - she was desperate for them to be sent to boarding schools!
I want my DC (currently 3 and 1) to do well, but quite frankly, we earn far too much to be considered for a bursary, and not enough to pay school fees for two DC without serious sacrifice.
SHe is making me feel that as her DCs are now off to the best schools in UK that I will be harming my DCs by not putting their schools first in out list of requirements when moving back. We are comfortably well off, but I am not so keen to reduce our lifestyle to the point that we all struggle to live a decent lifestyle so our DCs can go to private school. I have always presumed that if a child is bright, they will succeed whatever.
I would love to hear opinions, as I am not so familiar with the school system here:
- Is the school situation so bad that we must choose to live in the catchment area of a good school rather than live where we like?
2)Is state education really so bad here? My DH went to a state school and still studied at Oxford
- SHould we be taking the view that we should sacrifice an awful lot just to get our DCs into prep and private schools.
I realise there is a lot here, but I would love some opinions.
Thanks!