I have decided to give my children a Waldorf Steiner influenced home education. I have also done the Steiner teacher training in London.
There are some wonderful (and a few not so wonderful) ideas behind the Steiner method and curriculum. It's all about what you choose to take out of it. The great thing about home education is you can ditch any of the stuff you don't like!
Rudolf Steiner also invented biodynamic agriculture using some very radical philosophies and there doesn't seem to be much heated debate about that so he can't have been totally mad!
The reading/writing debate:
I could read when I was very young and I really love books and am a very fluent reader. However, I am also a psychologist and am very concerned about how much "left brain" focused modern education is becoming. Studies have shown that our right brain is becoming less and less active and I personally think that this is a bad thing.
By delaying reading and writing to a later age, and having a calmer, more playing focussed life before six/seven I believe, helps to redress this balance. As long as the child has a good teacher, there is no reason why he/she shouldn't be able to read very well within a year if they start at six/seven (like many other European countries). Einstein didn't go to school till he was nearly seven!
I personally find that reception classes here have become way too full on for four year olds - and their poor exhausted teachers!
Where do I stand on the Steiner debate? I'm really pro his method of education and his curriculum, there are some truly inspired ideas. However, I'm still to be convinced by Steiner schools... some of them seem to be great but some of them could really do with a thorough shake up to say the least.