My son's KS2 sats wasn't great (not the worst), I know he's more capable than the results show. And on another day he probably would of achieved year 6 standard.
I think what's worse is the wording achieved year 6 standard Vs did not meet standard
I'm concerned with High School he'll be put in a bottom set, he works hard but easily distracted.
His scores were ;
Reading 102 this is great he has struggled with reading a bit but made loads of progress over the past few months and he now goes off and read on his own
Maths 95 I can't help but think they struggled to understand his hand writing
Spelling grammar and punctuation 97 again his hand writing is very poor something which makes it look like he's miss spelt but it's actually correct
Writing was classed as working towards. I think here is his hand writing keeps him behind
Science which I'm very surprised about was not met standards this is teachers assessment this is subject which I thought he was good at and had a very good understanding.
I've noticed it seems as the students who are going on to the schools group highschool got a higher scores than those who are going elsewhere.
I don't think it's worth appealing the results or is it? His high school told me they assess them in the first few weeks and after first term they then get moved.
Then to rub it in after school we went to the beach and another parent had to open her son's results in front of everyone pretending she hadn't seen them with all scores higher than 112.