My dd has two kids like this in her y6 class. Sparks flew and chaos ensued.
The “therapeutic behaviour policy” meant rewards more than sanctions. Lots of classroom evacuations. Lots of chat about recognising your anger, yadder yadder. The school had a small area of trees and found staffing to run a permanent forest school where the worst kids spent a few afternoons each week. It gave the other kids a breather, but dd felt it was unfair. My dd (well-behaved) only did one half-term of forest school for an hour a week.
My dd was stuck on a table with one of the kids that was very disruptive all of her year6. I asked the teacher to make sure she wasn’t getting too stressed out by him but by this stage dd had it in hand. She’d been with this kid for years so she knew him, she had learned to manage him as well as any of the teachers. I had enrolled her in martial arts age 8 so she had some self-defence skills, and she encouraged rumours about her ninja skills. She made it patently clear if he even dared to touch her, he’d seriously regret it. Age 10 she told me her “killer stare” kept him off her back. She helped him with his school work a lot. In the end, she rather liked him, and he told everyone he was terrified of her. He called her “my scary friend”.
But not so the other boys. Broken arm on one occasion. Fighting in the loos during lesson time. Fighting on the playground. Verbal abuse, threats and sexualised language and gestures directed at teachers and pupils alike. Disruption like angry outbursts (ripped a door off a cupboard, throwing the water bottles all over the place like missiles).
My dd says she remembers hearing her y6 teacher having rows with HT in the corridor saying things like “I have no way to deal with it. What am I meant to do?”
One thing that did seem to work was the worse-behaved of the two boys was sent to sit in the HT office most of the day and given lunch and break separately rather than in class instead of being fully suspended or excluded. You could ask for that to happen, to keep the kids safe?
HT refused to exclude. I was surprised, after the broken arm incident. I think HT really believed ALL kids deserve some education and frankly if that’s at the cost of some kids getting the best outcomes then fine, sacrifice worth making. So aim for everyone to pass SATs averagely but don’t worry about passing well, it’s unnecessary. That means if the class is severely disrupted it can probably be absorbed. I get that - possibly even agree - but it’s different when it’s your own child’s education and Mh being affected.
The class teacher left the school at end of DD’s y6, I don’t blame her. The kids know they have all the power.
The crazy thing is the school got Outstanding at ofsted. The HT found budget to give all the kids haribos as a bribe to be good, and everyone got promised “Friday fun day” with no lessons as a follow-up bribe after the visit. Told when the ofsted inspector comes round, if teacher asks a question everyone raises a hand - open-hand if you are sure know the answer, or closed in a fist if you don’t. And so on - a million ways to try and trick the outcome.
Or perhaps other schools are worse and really this is as good as it gets? Horrible thought.
Secondary school was having none of it though - the worst of the boys was in a special educational setting by the end of Y7 as unable to be managed in mainstream. Best thing for him, he needed help and boundaries not the lawless, woke nonsense at his primary school.