Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

How's the Private School VAT increase impacting you?

1000 replies

mumsthewordi · 06/01/2025 23:04

To private fee paying ...are kids/s still in private ? Are you comfortably still able to afford and happy paying it ?

To state, how do you feel? Have you been impacted by more kids in class or would you expect that to play out this year? Or perhaps you weren't supportive ?
Do you think state schools will improve ?

Full disclosure
A struggling fee paying parent of one kid only other is at state and my oh is an amazing secondary school teacher - we are a divided household indeed at time, but we've made choices best for us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
JamesDad2 · 11/01/2025 11:42

Liddlemoreaction · 11/01/2025 11:08

It’s made up bollocks from private parents who have realised that most people don’t care what fees private parents pay for schooling. So they’re trying to make it sound as if we’ll all suffer, we’re all in this together type rhetoric.
Except we aren’t all in it together. That’s why they’ve opted OUT of state schooling.
We’re all fine thanks.

Why do any children/parents have to ‘suffer’? This attitude is ridiculous

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 11:50

JamesDad2 · 11/01/2025 11:42

Why do any children/parents have to ‘suffer’? This attitude is ridiculous

Exactly.

No one will benefit.

So why support a policy where the whole point is for private parents and children to suffer. To punish them for having opted out of a state benefit. Confused

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 12:08

it's fucking obtuse to then additionally tax us on the money we're subbing the government

Of course, we're already paying income tax on the money we're subbing the government. If anything, that should be removed to genuinely give a tax break on the money we directly sub the government - not a second layer of tax added on top.

State school child:
State pays £7000 (assuming no SEN)

Private school child at £20k school pre-VAT
State receives min £13k in income tax (40%tax)
And pays nothing
State is £20k better off
per year
per child

Private school child at £20k school post-VAT
State receives £16k in income tax
And £4k VAT
And pays nothing
State is £27k better off
WTF?!?

How can anyone can possibly say the private school was ever a tax break with a straight face? Sheer brass neck and CF-ery. Or an inability to do basic maths.

Sasskitty · 11/01/2025 12:30

Liddlemoreaction · 11/01/2025 11:08

It’s made up bollocks from private parents who have realised that most people don’t care what fees private parents pay for schooling. So they’re trying to make it sound as if we’ll all suffer, we’re all in this together type rhetoric.
Except we aren’t all in it together. That’s why they’ve opted OUT of state schooling.
We’re all fine thanks.

‘It’s made up bollocks from private parents who have realised that most people don’t care what fees private parents pay for schooling’…

Oh come now. The bigotry dripping from your previous post/s (I’ve not kept up properly after Hugo and Clem), show that you Do care what ‘fees private parents pay for schooling’.

You’re positively thrilled they’re paying even more. Thrilled that some can’t continue to pay the fees. Thrilled they’ll have to join the local (or even better for you, not so local) state school instead. Own it. Well, I guess you and others already sort of, have.

TheignT · 11/01/2025 12:37

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 12:08

it's fucking obtuse to then additionally tax us on the money we're subbing the government

Of course, we're already paying income tax on the money we're subbing the government. If anything, that should be removed to genuinely give a tax break on the money we directly sub the government - not a second layer of tax added on top.

State school child:
State pays £7000 (assuming no SEN)

Private school child at £20k school pre-VAT
State receives min £13k in income tax (40%tax)
And pays nothing
State is £20k better off
per year
per child

Private school child at £20k school post-VAT
State receives £16k in income tax
And £4k VAT
And pays nothing
State is £27k better off
WTF?!?

How can anyone can possibly say the private school was ever a tax break with a straight face? Sheer brass neck and CF-ery. Or an inability to do basic maths.

I don't understand this bit

Private school child at £20k school pre-VAT
State receives min £13k in income tax (40%tax)
And pays nothing
State is £20k better off
per year
per child

Where is the £13k in income tax coming from?

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 12:40

Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the NEU says: “We have had reports from members that the VAT increase is impacting [upon] jobs, pensions and pay increases"
But no, there's no impact and it must all be the fault of the schools eh?!

Araminta1003 · 11/01/2025 12:44

Labour have made a lot of mistakes already, I reckon there will have to be some serious rethinking and reshuffling. They have already proven their economic incompetence- they simply cannot afford to be fiscally incompetent anymore. If this proves a disaster, they will have to backtrack.
They can’t even pass more taxes to businesses either to compensate for their mistakes because most successful businesses have debt too (to invest in growth, not least) they just screwed everyone over already by not listening. They will have to eat humble pie.

Araminta1003 · 11/01/2025 12:47

Also whoever advised them that private school parents, many of whom are Blairite generation, are loyal Tories was seriously mistaken. Clearly no proper due diligence was undertaken on any of this.

JamesDad2 · 11/01/2025 13:08

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 11:50

Exactly.

No one will benefit.

So why support a policy where the whole point is for private parents and children to suffer. To punish them for having opted out of a state benefit. Confused

Edited

I think we all know why.

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:09

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:14

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 11:50

Exactly.

No one will benefit.

So why support a policy where the whole point is for private parents and children to suffer. To punish them for having opted out of a state benefit. Confused

Edited

State education is NOT a state benefit. It is a state service.

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:30

TheignT · 11/01/2025 12:37

I don't understand this bit

Private school child at £20k school pre-VAT
State receives min £13k in income tax (40%tax)
And pays nothing
State is £20k better off
per year
per child

Where is the £13k in income tax coming from?

In order to pay £20k school fees, the parents must earn £33k. They give £13k to the government in income tax (assuming 40% income tax band). This leaves them £20k net to pay the school.

If the parents didn't pay the school fees, all else being equal they wouldn't need to earn that money. And the government wouldn't get the income tax.

On top of that, the government now have to pay £7k to educate the child (since the parents aren't doing it any more)

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:33

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:14

State education is NOT a state benefit. It is a state service.

Everything the government pays for (out of money gathered in taxes) which you benefit from is a benefit.

It's artificial to make a distinction between a benefit given in money and a benefit given in kind like education.

Whymeee · 11/01/2025 13:41

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:30

In order to pay £20k school fees, the parents must earn £33k. They give £13k to the government in income tax (assuming 40% income tax band). This leaves them £20k net to pay the school.

If the parents didn't pay the school fees, all else being equal they wouldn't need to earn that money. And the government wouldn't get the income tax.

On top of that, the government now have to pay £7k to educate the child (since the parents aren't doing it any more)

What % of parents actually have to work to pay for PS instead of grandparents or other types of unearned wealth?

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:43

Whymeee · 11/01/2025 13:41

What % of parents actually have to work to pay for PS instead of grandparents or other types of unearned wealth?

Er the majority of us! Most of us don't have grandparents wealth/inheritance and therefore in a 2 income household, 1 of the incomes will almost exclusively pay for fees.

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:47

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:33

Everything the government pays for (out of money gathered in taxes) which you benefit from is a benefit.

It's artificial to make a distinction between a benefit given in money and a benefit given in kind like education.

Wrong. This might help you understand what is a state service and what is a state benefit https://www.gov.uk/income-tax/taxfree-and-taxable-state-benefits

Income Tax: introduction

Income Tax is a tax you pay on your earnings - find out about what it is, how you pay and how to check you're paying the right amount using HMRC's tax calculator.

https://www.gov.uk/income-tax/taxfree-and-taxable-state-benefits

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:48

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:43

Er the majority of us! Most of us don't have grandparents wealth/inheritance and therefore in a 2 income household, 1 of the incomes will almost exclusively pay for fees.

Anecdote. Evidence?

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:51

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:48

Anecdote. Evidence?

What evidence? No data exists because no body asks parents who pays for the fees. What a ridiculous demand

Whymeee · 11/01/2025 13:52

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:43

Er the majority of us! Most of us don't have grandparents wealth/inheritance and therefore in a 2 income household, 1 of the incomes will almost exclusively pay for fees.

I can't find proper statistics, only the data from 2 wealth management companies that 68-79% of their elderly wealthy clients "help" with school fees, but it doesn't mean that every child has a wealthy GP/inheritance.
But then a thread came up in the search and it looks like it's still quite common. So if those GP moneys are not spent on the fees, they will be taxed in other forms.
www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/4457911-do-grandparents-pay-your-school-fees

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:52

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:48

Anecdote. Evidence?

Where is the evidence that grandparents or unearned wealth pays? Actual evidence?

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:53

Whymeee · 11/01/2025 13:52

I can't find proper statistics, only the data from 2 wealth management companies that 68-79% of their elderly wealthy clients "help" with school fees, but it doesn't mean that every child has a wealthy GP/inheritance.
But then a thread came up in the search and it looks like it's still quite common. So if those GP moneys are not spent on the fees, they will be taxed in other forms.
www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/4457911-do-grandparents-pay-your-school-fees

Amd how many parents do those 2 wealth companies represent?

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:54

twistyizzy · 11/01/2025 13:51

What evidence? No data exists because no body asks parents who pays for the fees. What a ridiculous demand

Exactly. So you actually don't know that most people pay it themselves. I have many friends whose parents have set up funds for their grandchildren's education but that is anecdote too. My reality is just as valid as yours.

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:54

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:47

Wrong. This might help you understand what is a state service and what is a state benefit https://www.gov.uk/income-tax/taxfree-and-taxable-state-benefits

What a very emotional response from you.

The government is talking there about specific financial benefits individuals can apply for.

But something the government pays for, which you benefit from in kind, is still a benefit.

Kittiwakeup · 11/01/2025 13:55

strawberrybubblegum · 11/01/2025 13:54

What a very emotional response from you.

The government is talking there about specific financial benefits individuals can apply for.

But something the government pays for, which you benefit from in kind, is still a benefit.

I'm not emotional at all. You are just wrong. State education is not a benefit. Full stop.

Saturdayssandwichsociety · 11/01/2025 13:55

AdoraBell · 08/01/2025 09:55

Our DC are adults now but DH’s cousin has 3 DC with SEN.

They are in a small independent school because they cannot cope with the mainstream system. All are doing well right now. Parents can’t afford the fees now so applied to state schools. Their local authority has no space, so either the authority will have to pay the fees or the DC won’t be educated. Both parents work FT, one is a teacher, and they can’t afford one to stop working.

Cousins are waiting for a response from the authority.

The local authority will make space by temporarily increasing the PAN at a local school. This is well within their power to do they simply inform the school.
They will not pay private school fees for a family rather than increasing a state school PAN, unless there are EHCP's involved

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread