Thank you for sharing Araminta
I’m getting really worried by the way this IFS report you linked to and other newspaper reports phrases the ‘skyrocketing’ ‘spiraling’ etc costs of state support for SEND. Luke Sibieta of IFS, is saying it’s either reform these needs (ie don’t pay for them) or cut per pupil funding in schools. which any government person like his old flatmate best man BFF the government minister will know is a massive vote loser. It’s a false alternative though because kids with SEND are easily dismissed by ableism. He could just as equally have said, fund SEND kids with what they need and let’s cut some other area of spending.
Starmer’s government are already talking about dismantling the 2014 SEND reforms rather than funding these kids education as intended. As reported a while ago in the FT: Keir Starmer looks at sweeping reforms to special education needs https://archive.is/Pw2eP
I am really scared for what all this means in terms of educational support for kids with SEND for the future. ‘Reforms’ isn’t quite the right word here when it’s actually meaning solely financially motivated massive cuts. Theres not going to be any consideration of the child’s best interests.
Nobody knows why there are more SEND DC of school age than there used to be. Possibly more girls needs are being recognised or maybe the school environment has been changing in ways that are less inclusive to SEND over the years. But we are where we are and people need to stop speaking in this dehumanising way about those kids with SEND needing an education.
Would the government and taxpayers really rather that today’s kids with SEND are left to go on to lead under educated, more isolated, more underemployed, less independent, less productive, less fulfilled and less happy adult lives than they could have done?
The current statistics for employment for adults with autism are awful. We are already wasting an opportunity to do things for today’s kids differently. Making it yet worse still, by cutting support even further, is a horrifying prospect.
Still, looking for something positive to say, in the IFS report there’s some good news for parents of under 5s, the one age group that do get an increase in funding.