Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

How's the Private School VAT increase impacting you?

1000 replies

mumsthewordi · 06/01/2025 23:04

To private fee paying ...are kids/s still in private ? Are you comfortably still able to afford and happy paying it ?

To state, how do you feel? Have you been impacted by more kids in class or would you expect that to play out this year? Or perhaps you weren't supportive ?
Do you think state schools will improve ?

Full disclosure
A struggling fee paying parent of one kid only other is at state and my oh is an amazing secondary school teacher - we are a divided household indeed at time, but we've made choices best for us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:33

.. 1/10 places.. at least 🤷‍♀️

How's the Private School VAT increase impacting you?
Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:34

CWFortescue · 08/01/2025 09:26

I would be interested in views on why UK has decided to tax (some) educational services when no other country in Europe has done the same.

I do not know what the situation is in North America/other developed countries.

What is so special about education in UK?

Do we think this is a Brexit dividend?

Greece attempted the same, in 2015. Same sort of misguided ideological reasons.

Araminta1003 · 08/01/2025 09:37

QE boys/Westminster are both incredibly difficult to get in. The competition is immense at 11 plus level. Now we can argue that not all kids have access to competitive environments and that some kids develop later. But the vast majority of the DCs at these schools are very intelligent, regardless of Oxbridge. They do not need Oxbridge. The argument is more to spread their brains around other unis potentially so that the playing field between the universities gets levelled. However, for Oxbridge themselves it is not good news. Most of these kids are absolutely used to thriving and competiting in an elite pushy academic environment.

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 09:38

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:33

.. 1/10 places.. at least 🤷‍♀️

For those without access to the article or who have only read the screenshot, that's a POLAR postcode scheme, not a state school scheme. Is that it?

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 09:42

Araminta1003 · 08/01/2025 09:37

QE boys/Westminster are both incredibly difficult to get in. The competition is immense at 11 plus level. Now we can argue that not all kids have access to competitive environments and that some kids develop later. But the vast majority of the DCs at these schools are very intelligent, regardless of Oxbridge. They do not need Oxbridge. The argument is more to spread their brains around other unis potentially so that the playing field between the universities gets levelled. However, for Oxbridge themselves it is not good news. Most of these kids are absolutely used to thriving and competiting in an elite pushy academic environment.

I was just using QE/Westminster as an example to show how Oxbridge measure GSCEs not by private/state but by school stats. Maybe not the best example. Obviously, both schools get a lot into Oxbridge because they're incredibly selective, but it works the same further down the ladder... going to state does not give you an advantage for getting into Oxbridge per se.

FruitPolos · 08/01/2025 09:48

It doesn't impact us at all because the nearest primary private school is an hour's drive away. The nearest private secondary school is 45 minutes.

The middle class parents are all very invested in the local schools. They get involved with fundraising, donations etc. Local business leaders sponsor school projects.

All the primary schools in my area are rated good or outstanding. The local secondary school gets excellent results.

We're in quite a unique area where there is a lot of deprivation, but equally, a lot of high incomes due to a specific industry. The high income families don't really have much choice over schooling unless they are willing to travel large distances over rural roads. And the state schools benefit from this.

AdoraBell · 08/01/2025 09:55

Our DC are adults now but DH’s cousin has 3 DC with SEN.

They are in a small independent school because they cannot cope with the mainstream system. All are doing well right now. Parents can’t afford the fees now so applied to state schools. Their local authority has no space, so either the authority will have to pay the fees or the DC won’t be educated. Both parents work FT, one is a teacher, and they can’t afford one to stop working.

Cousins are waiting for a response from the authority.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:59

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 09:29

This has absolutely nothing to do with your original claims and you don;t seem to know enough about the process to understand that. What is your experience here?

😂 ok

strawberrybubblegum · 08/01/2025 10:01

Fordian · 07/01/2025 20:56

@morechocolateneededtoday
Oh, that's disappointing. Can you find me an example?

This thread has been OK, but many have been shocking. Here's one very typical thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/5093889-request-a-state-school-place-if-you-want-it-or-not

In that thread people were saying that there there's nothing nasty so I answered (on page 8) with the anti-private comments I pulled out from the first 2 pages (it continued in the same vein). Here they are:

page1:
What absolute selfish pricks.

Not the smartest, for all their money, are they?

What utter arseholes. I hope the 20% increase definitely happens.

Entitled selfish pricks

This gives private school parents a bad name. Very selfish indeed.

I can't wait to vote Labour because of all the moaning private school parents.

Money doesn’t buy class, sometimes it just creates entitled arseholes

Utterly selfish and totally self absorbed.

moving onto page 2:
private schools; helping some thick but rich kids succeed

people who’ve never had to deal with any kind of financial adversity are now throwing all their toys out of the pram because they are greedy and want to keep all their wealth for themselves

entitled private schooled idiots

The insults and name calling continued in later pages, including calling us cunts and a poster saying they want to tax 40% instead.

It's been pretty upsetting and horrible for many private school parents (including me) who have always been very engaged in society and big contributors: and now we have this contempt, hatred and othering against us and our children.

It's been incredibly damaging. And the vitriol absolutely hasn't been in both directions.

People saying that they haven't seen nasty comments make it even worse... because it shows they read all those comments and agree.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:02

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 09:38

For those without access to the article or who have only read the screenshot, that's a POLAR postcode scheme, not a state school scheme. Is that it?

You’re transparent, it’s getting silly. Oxford demonstrably accepted pupils who failed normal entrance criteria. POLAR postcode means, usually, shit state school. You can try to twist facts but here we are.

Mirabai · 08/01/2025 10:08

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:02

You’re transparent, it’s getting silly. Oxford demonstrably accepted pupils who failed normal entrance criteria. POLAR postcode means, usually, shit state school. You can try to twist facts but here we are.

From the article:

A don involved in admissions said: “The part about being admitted ‘on the same rigorous basis as all other students’ strongly implies that academic standards are not being compromised by this scheme, which is simply false.
“I have known students admitted under this scheme who could not write essays in grammatical English, something previously unknown in my experience among Oxford undergraduates”…. < >

Admissions tutors are told that candidates must normally be educated at state school from the age of 11 to 18. It says if on “rare occasions” a tutor wants to nominate a privately-educated student they are likely to be questioned by the programme’s lead.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:08

strawberrybubblegum · 08/01/2025 10:01

This thread has been OK, but many have been shocking. Here's one very typical thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/5093889-request-a-state-school-place-if-you-want-it-or-not

In that thread people were saying that there there's nothing nasty so I answered (on page 8) with the anti-private comments I pulled out from the first 2 pages (it continued in the same vein). Here they are:

page1:
What absolute selfish pricks.

Not the smartest, for all their money, are they?

What utter arseholes. I hope the 20% increase definitely happens.

Entitled selfish pricks

This gives private school parents a bad name. Very selfish indeed.

I can't wait to vote Labour because of all the moaning private school parents.

Money doesn’t buy class, sometimes it just creates entitled arseholes

Utterly selfish and totally self absorbed.

moving onto page 2:
private schools; helping some thick but rich kids succeed

people who’ve never had to deal with any kind of financial adversity are now throwing all their toys out of the pram because they are greedy and want to keep all their wealth for themselves

entitled private schooled idiots

The insults and name calling continued in later pages, including calling us cunts and a poster saying they want to tax 40% instead.

It's been pretty upsetting and horrible for many private school parents (including me) who have always been very engaged in society and big contributors: and now we have this contempt, hatred and othering against us and our children.

It's been incredibly damaging. And the vitriol absolutely hasn't been in both directions.

People saying that they haven't seen nasty comments make it even worse... because it shows they read all those comments and agree.

Sad isn’t it. Labour must be loving it, they stoked this fire after all. I hadn’t actually seen that thread, for which I’m grateful!!

strawberrybubblegum · 08/01/2025 10:10

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 09:27

Sasskitty explicitly said that Cambridge applicants were given lower offers from state schools, which is explicitly not the case and has never been the case. That's an entirely different point to whether there were targets to reduce the over-representation of private school pupils in the intake (and it was only ever reduction, the over-representation is still there).

I don't deny that people try to work the system by switching from private to state at sixth form, but that doesn't really work unless they switch to a school that gets flagged for having zero Oxbridge applicants, which is unlikely to be what they're doing. GCSEs are also weighted according to the school cohort you sat them in, so while that could also work against the state switchers it also means that eg. QE Boys is already treated the same as Westminster. No state advantage there, just good candidates getting in.

edit that's @strawberrybubblegum

Edited

But the targets don't just sit there Confused.

The targets give an explicit instruction to admissions tutors to give offers to state students in preference to a private candidate with the same ability.

It's obviously not just about grades required. There are too many students with top grades for that to be the gate. They only give offers to some students, even with the very top grades.

tortoise18 · 08/01/2025 10:12

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:59

😂 ok

None then. Just the ability to google and, having no actual knowledge, misinterpret.

Mirabai · 08/01/2025 10:13

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:08

Sad isn’t it. Labour must be loving it, they stoked this fire after all. I hadn’t actually seen that thread, for which I’m grateful!!

It’s a shame that they’re resorting to the same kind of divisive populist rhetoric as the Tories. They seem to be employing the same tactics regarding benefit reform. I say this as an erstwhile Labour voter.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:14

Mirabai · 08/01/2025 10:08

From the article:

A don involved in admissions said: “The part about being admitted ‘on the same rigorous basis as all other students’ strongly implies that academic standards are not being compromised by this scheme, which is simply false.
“I have known students admitted under this scheme who could not write essays in grammatical English, something previously unknown in my experience among Oxford undergraduates”…. < >

Admissions tutors are told that candidates must normally be educated at state school from the age of 11 to 18. It says if on “rare occasions” a tutor wants to nominate a privately-educated student they are likely to be questioned by the programme’s lead.

Edited

‘A don involved in admissions said: “The part about being admitted ‘on the same rigorous basis as all other students’ strongly implies that academic standards are not being compromised by this scheme, which is simply false.

“I have known students admitted under this scheme who could not write essays in grammatical English, something previously unknown in my experience among Oxford undergraduates” ‘

We all knew this but of course, as they state- it is not declared or admitted to. I suppose they had to see sense, when they were faced with the consequences.

Kittiwakeup · 08/01/2025 10:18

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 09:20

🙄 grammar school kids don’t need contextual offers. Their advantage and leg up is already there. The fact they had a grammar school as a possibility demonstrates everything. Hence Oxbridge are trying to get away from offering ‘state’ school kids, and finally recognising that not all state schools, are equal.

Of course grammar school DC don't need contextual offers. Read my post!!!!!!! Do your posts ever deviate from their rhetoric?

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:19

Mirabai · 08/01/2025 10:13

It’s a shame that they’re resorting to the same kind of divisive populist rhetoric as the Tories. They seem to be employing the same tactics regarding benefit reform. I say this as an erstwhile Labour voter.

This indeed. I was a Labour Party member. A different life time ago. I haven’t voted for them in years. I’ve never voted Tory. Labour lost my vote when they threw women’s rights under a bus. This VAT issue is another symptom of how atrocious they have become. There must be millions of politically homeless people right now.

EHCPerhaps · 08/01/2025 10:20

LittleRedRidingHoody · 07/01/2025 20:11

I agree with this.

I'm fairly neutral on this subject - this is the first VAT thread I've joined! But I do think there's lots of complaining about children being adversely effected when moving to state - schools are used to dealing with large groups of new starters, I'm sure they'll survive as will the children.

Of course there are exceptions - SEN being a huge one - but I don't think the supposed droves leaving private for state are all going to have their education upended because they had to move school once.

Why you think that parents like us have our SEND kids in private schools in the first place? Our kids started out in state schools. They often had to move several times to find one of those that worked for their SEND just in their primary years. Out kids aren’t all
academic highfliers who will get great results and these disruptions have already really affected them.

We have all cried and begged for help for our kids in state school. The school staff did their absolute level best to help our kids, before in many cases concluding that our kids’ needs’ just couldn’t be met there?

The resources just weren’t there. And nothing the schools could do to help with the best will in the world was making it possible. For kids with sensory issues the size and noise levels in a class of 31+ don’t allow for that. The attendance targets pit schools against parents of kids with EBSNA. Private school is an absolute last resort for us. The special schools are full with waiting lists going up to years. None of this is our kids fault. So please don’t downplay disruption when you have absolutely no idea what a lot of SEND kids have already been through.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 10:21

Kittiwakeup · 08/01/2025 10:18

Of course grammar school DC don't need contextual offers. Read my post!!!!!!! Do your posts ever deviate from their rhetoric?

What is my ‘rhetoric’?

EHCPerhaps · 08/01/2025 11:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Reporting as a personal a as personal attack your disgusting ableist comments

durness · 08/01/2025 11:25

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 06:52

@durness I wasn’t referring to the vat situation. I’d rather they weren’t introducing vat on education (it wasn’t a ‘subsidy’ btw), but it wont really affect us. It is simply morally wrong. And an envy policy from Labour.

i was talking about the bias against privately educated children, in some unis and uni course admissions.

Edited

Dear oh dear.

Access to higher quality education based on ability to pay is what’s morally wrong.

There’s no bias against private schools. It’s a redress against a structural bias in favour of private schools.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 11:40

@durness please don’t ’dear oh dear me’, it’s nasty.

‘Access to higher quality education based on ability to pay is what’s morally wrong’

That is the situation in this country. And so that is the game we’re playing.

A similar argument is made / can be made against grammar schools. Or ‘outstanding’ state schools. Those lucky enough to afford to live in / move to areas where they exist, or are able to pay for tutors to get in, is ‘morally wrong’. All remaining grammar schools should be closed down, to prevent this frankly, unethical practice.

durness · 08/01/2025 11:44

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 11:40

@durness please don’t ’dear oh dear me’, it’s nasty.

‘Access to higher quality education based on ability to pay is what’s morally wrong’

That is the situation in this country. And so that is the game we’re playing.

A similar argument is made / can be made against grammar schools. Or ‘outstanding’ state schools. Those lucky enough to afford to live in / move to areas where they exist, or are able to pay for tutors to get in, is ‘morally wrong’. All remaining grammar schools should be closed down, to prevent this frankly, unethical practice.

It’s the game we’re playing, too. We’re just not complaining about the cost of our choices.

I’m not a fan of the grammar system either.

Sasskitty · 08/01/2025 11:48

Someone who loves Labour should start a thread (and campaign), about the sheer hypocrisy and existence of the few state grammar schools. The leg up these pupils get, is immense.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread