Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

If you’re charged VAT will you remove your child from their private school? I’m v stressed!

1000 replies

Liikklu · 27/05/2024 18:05

We won’t be able to pay the increase. Only hope is asking grandparents for the shortfall which we don’t want to do. Anyone else in a similar boat? Do you think it will literally be a 20% increase on fees or will schools absorb some of it? Our school has said they will address the matter ‘if and when’ it applies.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PropertyManager · 28/05/2024 00:03

Disneydatknee88 · 27/05/2024 23:59

My kids attend public school and we have never been near financially well off enough to send our kids to private school but the cost of living is effecting us all. Just because you send your kids to private school does not mean you have unlimited funds. Higher earners have higher mortgages. Higher childcare costs and school fees. 20% is a massive hike! Hopefully this is not something that comes into play anytime soon. Please try not to worry too much. I understand other commenters on here having little sympathy considering they are already struggling but it's all relative. I hope you've had some useful advice here from people in the same boat. Money is such a weird one to talk about, especially from those "better off" because they want to keep the illusion that they are. There is no shame in starting that conversation.

Sorry to be a pedant, but public schools are an elite grouping of private schools, state or maintained is the correct terminology for schools that are publicly funded in the UK.

Intothevalley · 28/05/2024 00:08

Do I want to pay +20% for DD's school fees? No, not really.

But I'm a liberal, and I believe that the rich(er) should pay what they can into society, and the poor should take what they need.

If this is some sort of 'rich tax', I'd prefer it was applied to the billionaires, rather than the middle class double income workers, but hey ho.

noblegiraffe · 28/05/2024 00:09

StormingNorman · 27/05/2024 23:58

Irrespective, the govt has just lost money as it now has the burden of educating pupils transferring into state schools.

Lost money on that pupil, but making a profit on the ones (the majority) who stay.

Disneydatknee88 · 28/05/2024 00:09

PropertyManager · 28/05/2024 00:03

Sorry to be a pedant, but public schools are an elite grouping of private schools, state or maintained is the correct terminology for schools that are publicly funded in the UK.

Apologies. I'm not in with the lingo. I meant my kids go to regular school that costs no money to attend.

newmummycwharf1 · 28/05/2024 00:09

HereToo · 27/05/2024 23:59

That doesn't mean they should be asked to.

If they say no because they can't afford it or don't want to, it's likely to make them feel guilty.

Fine if they offer, but the OP shouldn't ask.

These are the OP's parents. Of course you can ask your parents - that is what family is for. If they don't have it or can't give for whatever reason, fair enough. Grandparents delight in supporting their descendants if they are able to - that is the whole point - at least should be! I hope my kids, grandkids never hesitate to ask me to help.

Bululu · 28/05/2024 00:10

‘If this is some sort of 'rich tax', I'd prefer it was applied to the billionaires, rather than the middle class double income workers, but hey ho.’

but hey ho there is not incentives for the middle class to live here anymore.

Floatingvoternolandinsight · 28/05/2024 00:14

whiteboardking · 27/05/2024 23:17

I have little sympathy as all the private school parents I know look down on the state sector - often without ever being in it or only primary. There is a huge perception amongst them that their child would be dragged down in state. I also know amazing kids in state high schools who would absolutely love smaller classes, amazing sports facilities, sports every day with specialised sports coaches etc. But reality is that they are on free school dinners & suffer period poverty.
The gulf between them is massive & heartbreaking. Mine are state educated at a great comp and I can pay for sports / music etc but most can't.
I'd like that VAT money to help level it out a bit

Mine went through the state system, our experience is that 60%-70% of teaching staff were either shit or required some level of additional support /retraining. it really didn't matter which of the two issues it was, the effect was the same - an inability to meet the requirements of the job. We did lots of extra curricular and our experience was not unique across three different education areas. Even at the Ofsted outstanding schools there were often issues, academic performance was bumped up by parents paying for tutors to try to get into the the best selective or private secondary schools. For my DC's the headteachers were also ALL Shit, bar one (3 year tenure). These were schools in decent areas. Behavior, 'low level disruption' was a huge issue, as was the poor standard of support by the dedicated Sencos or Teacher / Sencos.

IME Primary schools have increasing problems with children requiring higher levels of support often without the funds for that support/ barriers to formal diagnosis. Children were arriving not toilet trained and with a restricted vocabulary, in spite of funded nursery places. At secondary level the problem worsened. It was clear that many children were not at the level they should have been for a number of reasons including intentional and unintentional over scaffolding at the primary level or undiagnosed learning or behavior problems. This is before we get onto problematic home settings at both levels. Remember these are schools in 'average' areas with a low proportion of pupil premium students.

VAT on private schools is not going to level the playing field or stop teachers from leaving in droves. you cannot pay sufficient numbers of good people enough money to put up with toxic classroom environments, difficult parents or inept headteachers or inspectors. It's not going to prevent/address the effects of a problematic early years upbringing or identify why there are increasing numbers of children with additional needs. Those parents whose children are forced to go to a state school will just spend money on the best tutors.

This is a typical vote short term vote winning policy designed to attract the attention of blinkered, jealous or entitled voters.

newmummycwharf1 · 28/05/2024 00:14

Whatafustercluck · 27/05/2024 23:20

Or, to put it another way, less than half the average cost of a private school place. Not hard to see why the quality gap between state and private education is so huge, is it?

That is a political choice though. Private school parents will certainly do their bit - pay VAT etc. But ultimately, the government is going to need to invest more in education to make any real dent in the gap. And private school parents are paying fees, their taxes and possibly now VAT. The rest will have to come from elsewhere at some point!

Hillsmakeyoustrong · 28/05/2024 00:16

We will continue with private come what may. My year 2 twins have SEN and could not cope in state with the large class sizes, and more especially, the playground. My DS has just been referred to be assessed for autism and both of them are at least a year behind 'expectations.' We only moved them this year, and reluctantly so, as the local school is literally a short walk away, in a lovely community and we have many friends there. We don't only make financial sacrifices for our children, but also have significant time and logistical challenges but they are worth it because our kids now have the support they need and their self esteem has rocketed which is priceless. For those saying move to state and you can support and educate your kids at home, and they will be fine, it's simply not true for all children. If they are bright, then yes, I agree. But after 7 hours at school per day, 5 days a week, most kids with SEN literally do not have the capacity for extra learning and need to switch off.

On a more personal note, I cannot understand the sheer level of spite in some posters and that even the children have been mocked with name calling such as 'little Tarquin.' Such stereotyping would not be (and should not be) acceptable if it was aimed at any other group of people.

juggleit · 28/05/2024 00:18

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 27/05/2024 18:40

Have you considered switching to value brands at the supermarket? Or getting rid of expensive mobile phones / netflix subscriptions / brand name trainers etc?

😆 yeah that should cover it!

I don't agree with the two tier system but I can absolutely guarantee you that the private sector will Never be removed because the country in run, behind closed doors, by the privately educated elite and they want to keep it that way. The private sector will eventually be for the very wealthy and not for those seeking alternative provisions for their DC who could not cope in the state sector. My whole salary goes to cover school fees and we live on DP’s average income. It is a complete
Misconception that only the rich send their DC privately - most haters have absolutely no idea the sacrifices made by these families.

whiteboardking · 28/05/2024 00:19

@Floatingvoternolandinsight luckily our north west city comp is great and tbh the teachers are amazing but there just not enough funding. It's a very mixed area and I think around 25% pupil premium, maybe more. All the local high schools are great but same huge challenges. Some can't even do much extra curricular despite great facilities as no staff

Ozanj · 28/05/2024 00:19

I have a child I had to pay to have via ivf because local area only allows 1 attempt even when you have medical problems that were ignored by the nhs. 30k. I’m now paying for private because he’s on the waiting list for an adhd assessment and can’t handle large class sizes.

I will find a way to pay for his fees + vat. One of the things I’m doing is diversifying my investments so they pay me more of an income so I can cover part of the fees. I’m also ttc for number 2 and will be paying for ivf again soon.

I do this by budgeting and saving and investing carefully. We don’t spend a penny more than we have to & we deliberately bought a house under our means so we could afford ivf / private school for 2.

whiteboardking · 28/05/2024 00:22

@juggleit tbh I don't mean those with SEN children who can't cope in mainstream, But there's vast amount of children with SEN out of education all together as parents can't pay to go private. I know 5-6 personally.

80smonster · 28/05/2024 00:22

PropertyManager · 27/05/2024 23:38

Oh, and for those who think this is a great idea, assume a school charges £20K fees, assuming a full 20% on the whole fee, lets say £24K, so £4K to the government.

If charlies parents can't afford it and take him out, pop him in a state secondary, where the per pupil capitation is £15K. therefore instead of making £4K they have just lost £15K

It doesn't take long before you don't break even and put huge pressure on state provision.

Yup. That’s basically what’s going to happen.

Ozanj · 28/05/2024 00:22

juggleit · 28/05/2024 00:18

😆 yeah that should cover it!

I don't agree with the two tier system but I can absolutely guarantee you that the private sector will Never be removed because the country in run, behind closed doors, by the privately educated elite and they want to keep it that way. The private sector will eventually be for the very wealthy and not for those seeking alternative provisions for their DC who could not cope in the state sector. My whole salary goes to cover school fees and we live on DP’s average income. It is a complete
Misconception that only the rich send their DC privately - most haters have absolutely no idea the sacrifices made by these families.

Yes.

not just the rich. The kids of army officers also get private schools.

LittleBearPad · 28/05/2024 00:27

Ozanj · 28/05/2024 00:22

Yes.

not just the rich. The kids of army officers also get private schools.

Which the MoD pays for if they meet certain criteria. And it’s available to all ranks.

Under some scrutiny now due to various frauds.

Floatingvoternolandinsight · 28/05/2024 00:28

whiteboardking · 28/05/2024 00:19

@Floatingvoternolandinsight luckily our north west city comp is great and tbh the teachers are amazing but there just not enough funding. It's a very mixed area and I think around 25% pupil premium, maybe more. All the local high schools are great but same huge challenges. Some can't even do much extra curricular despite great facilities as no staff

You are very lucky to have a good school. Can I ask why there are no staff, if the school is great?

WalrusOfLove · 28/05/2024 00:29

I think we'll see a lot of people voting Tory for the first time this election. It could even swing it as a lot of people that would benefit from Labour tend to not vote, as happened last time.

pouracupofambition · 28/05/2024 00:31

Just send them to the nearest state school and use the savings for something else.

Why the need to go private?

noblegiraffe · 28/05/2024 00:56

PropertyManager · 27/05/2024 23:42

We, state grammar school, academy, get £15K per year, that covers everything, some schools get less but benefit from centralised services.

Edited

No you don't.

RespiceFinemKarma · 28/05/2024 00:59

LuluBlakey1 · 27/05/2024 23:12

I'm not aiming to winding anyone up. I am explaining that despite people saying things like 'I won't be happy if I can't do a job I love' because their child may have to leave boarding school and need looking after at home, government policy does not take those kind of individual circumstances into account. It is, supposedly, based on a philosophy of creating a long term greater good in society. I gave an example of a Tory policy and linked it to their political philosophy and the effects of the policy on different groups and said this is a Labour policy based on their very long-held position on private education - although this is a very watered-down policy given where they once stood which was for abolition of it.

How would you feel about the school becoming an academy - a state school but with more freedoms? They could keep their staff and specialisms.

Tell you what, if you can get Starmer and his cabinet to pull all of their kids out of the grammar and send them to an academy as well (seeing as it is unlikely any of them are FSM or SEN because grammars filter those out if they can) then fine, turn DDs school into whatever rat cage you want to. They won't do it and I can bet you they won't ever challenge the super selective grammar system. Funny how those who really could afford private like to imagine their privilege doesn't count if their kids get into a grammar.

oakleaffy · 28/05/2024 01:07

Newgirls · 27/05/2024 18:49

I imagine it will be phased in so won’t be a sudden 20% hit to parents.

I will say though in our area an unpopular school became very good when a new posh estate was built nearby - within a couple of years and a very good head, it is now outstanding. An influx of ‘keen’ parents for want of a better phrase, lead to higher numbers, better funding and a better school for all students. Long term this policy could work well - and that is the point surely

Absolutely this. ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

RespiceFinemKarma · 28/05/2024 01:09

Ozanj · 28/05/2024 00:19

I have a child I had to pay to have via ivf because local area only allows 1 attempt even when you have medical problems that were ignored by the nhs. 30k. I’m now paying for private because he’s on the waiting list for an adhd assessment and can’t handle large class sizes.

I will find a way to pay for his fees + vat. One of the things I’m doing is diversifying my investments so they pay me more of an income so I can cover part of the fees. I’m also ttc for number 2 and will be paying for ivf again soon.

I do this by budgeting and saving and investing carefully. We don’t spend a penny more than we have to & we deliberately bought a house under our means so we could afford ivf / private school for 2.

Just remember to factor in the 5-7%+ fee increases schools do every year, so it will be 20% on top of that for each child.

I'd also look for schools with a lot of pupils that will act as a buffer. I suspect the middle of the road rural offerings will slowly close as parents using those are usually stuck for options and scrimping.

RespiceFinemKarma · 28/05/2024 01:10

oakleaffy · 28/05/2024 01:07

Absolutely this. ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

No one knows. So do you prepare for the worst and scrabble for a place at a state school before September or risk it? A few in DD's year have already left for a grammar "before the rush".

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread