Aussiesim, re:
"some wild and nasty conclusions about me Cote, all based on the fact that you and I have a difference of opinion "
No. Difference of opinion is what Stripey and I have. You, on the other hand, have resorted to calling me names ('ignoramus') and saying I have 'had bugger all's experience with Steiner, or any other education facility for that matter by the sounds of things'. As a result, I concluded that you are the kind of person who cannot articulate her thoughts without resorting to personal attacks.
"I don't know what you are referring to regarding my education"
I have been referring to your exposure to Steiner education during your formative years. Was that not clear enough for you?
"For all you know I could have a PHD and be a member of MENSA."
Not to hurt your feelings, but we all know that would be fantastically unlikely, my dear. The ad hominems could possibly survive a university education in those of us with less of an intellectual disposition, but I have to insist that someone with a PhD would at least know how to spell it.
"I don't know why it is so controversial to say that certain countries have a bit of a history that has resulted in some stereotypical prejudices."
Bravo! It is a stereotype. And a prejudice. You have basically agreed with me regarding the invalidity of your argument that French government lists Steiner schools among cults because they don't like Germans. This is the kind of argument that shows you are... well... non-MENSA and non-PhD
I have to say, though, that whoever you asked to write this post for you has done a better job of putting sentences together than you have in your previous posts.