IT is true that for the majority of parents, some lifestyle changes over holidays and cars driven won't generate enough income to cover school fees.
However, it is also true as a number of people have said, that there are lots of state school educating parents who have higher incomes than those with kids in private schools. For some of those there is an element of choice and some reJigging of lifestyle and expenditure choices CAN make it affordable ....for some.
I can think of a number of my friends who have much bigger incomes than we do and who state educate, whereas we are privately educating. Neither is right or wrong, neither means we love our children or care and their education any more or less.
What has allowed us to do it and what 'choices' have they made which means they haven't got the cash for it?
- We live in a modest 3 bed semi and some of them live in 4 and 5 bed detached houses.
- we don't have a mortgage now and some of them have huge mortgages
- we holiday in the UK (3 or 4 hols a year, but each well under a grand) whereas some of them ski and have exotic holidays abroad.
- we have 2 small cars which are 8-10 years old whereas some of them have new, big cars every couple of years.
- we do basic diy and house maintenance, some of them have had loft extensions or other extensions and regularly engage in home improvements.
I'm not saying any of these choices are superior to any others or that choosing a big house and holidays is somehow a lesser choice. Those families have made choices and it may well be that the holidays and house etc deliver greater family satisfaction than using the money for education would bring. I also recognise that for most people it isn't an either/or because they aren't having private education OR the lifestyle.
However, I think this thread is about people for whom the decision to send private or not is a marginal one. The people we are talking about have decent enough incomes to start considering it, but are not rolling in it so school fees will never be a drop in the ocean. Whilst people lucky enough to even consider it are not the majority of the population, they are a larger proportion than those who do choose private in the end. For these people for whom the choice is marginal, lifestyle choices have to be made and are.....and in the end they reflect the one people value most, along. with some of the constraints they live under.
What people in those marginal circumstances consider 'necessary' to live varies for a start. We are talking about the middle classes in most cases and for some, a newish car and a house in a good area feels like an essential .....but it's actually a choice. They could equally live in a poorer area with a small mortgage and perhaps pay school fees......if they chose to. Many will prioritise the bigger house or the nicer area...and perhaps long term in terms of finance, that makes sense as the house will appreciate.
Ultimately I think that the sooner people start considering the issue, the more choices they have. So if people only start thinking about it 2 years before their kids go to school, by then they have determined the area they live in, the size of their mortgage etc and unless they make drastic changes quickly, don't have so many options. If people think about it 8 years before kids go to school (so before they are born) they can factor school fees into their choice of area to live, size of mortgage, savings etc.....they simply put themselves in a financial position to be more able to pay for it ......if that is something they want to do. It is true that some people on moderate incomes (and these are still high compared to the majority) can afford it because they saved hard for a decade before their kids went to school, they live in smaller houses and have a less expensive lifestyle. They gave themself the option by financially planning ahead and through their choices. This is for those marginal middle classes who have good solid incomes, not people for whom whatever choices they make, it will still never be affordable.