mumblesmumWed 04-Apr-12 15:03:44
I wonder how often infant schools do this to make their data look good, and absolutely screw the junior school in the process. We had 4 children start at the end of last summer from DIFFERENT infant schools - all reported at 2c. 3 of them were working at L1 in reading and writing! I guess that's the pressure on infant schools though, probably not helped by EYFS child-initiated learning.
littlelegs dd may have made expected progress from junior school entry data.
However, as indigo says - she's is a bit behind, although its odd for writing at this level to be above reading. Does her comprehension let her down? Are they giving any special interventions for the maths and reading?
Are the Y6 levels you quote teacher assessments or results of tests?
TBH I think dd's sats have been inflated throughout school, not just year 2. Her previous junior school doesn't even have a child working at level 3 in year 5/6, whereas the one she goes to now have almost a 1/4 of the children from the school at that level (with various reasons like death, change in family, behavioural issues etc).
Oooops, sorry Reading is 3a and writing is 3b
They are doing nothing to help her as she's 'doing so well'!!!!!!! :(
Those quoted are actual tests . . Just noticed they've got this years mock sats for English at a 3 - what on earth is that??