The school I teach in is due an ofsted inspection and so slt are, understandably, keen to make sure we do well. There have been issues in some subject areas with regards to lack of schemes of work and to counter this we are all re-writing our schemes onto new pro-formae. I have no problem with this. However, each scheme has to be written lesson by lesson (though not in full detail), which I don't feel is a) entirely useful as sometimes you need to change lesson plans, or b) acceptable under the planning guidelines (though I may have made that up). I was under the impression that long and medium term plans were acceptable in terms of schemes of work, though am prepared to be told I'm wrong.
The other thing is that a member of slt is doing learning walks every week specifically to look at planning. If this teacher comes into our lessons, we have to provide a full lesson plan. While planner style lesson plans will be accepted, we will have to explain why we haven't provided the full a4 lesson plan you might normally provide for a planned obs, such as for performance management. We will not know in advance whether we will be seen, so in effect all lessons will have to be planned in detail, referencing aen, eal, plts, etc.
Is this excessive or does this happen in other secondaries?