Having a birthday dinner at someone's home is about 90% of the experience of having it in the pub. The birthday person gets their dinner cooked for them (or takeaway ordered in), they see their loved ones, socialise, get out of their own home, but no, they just have to go to the pub and put others at risk because they want exactly what they want
This post - whilst I understand sprang from a particular circumstance - underlines the disparity between people.
To have the dinner in "someone's own home" with a takeaway or a home-cooked meal for guests is great but excludes:
- those living with parents, in assisted living, student acco or small rooms
- those with young children at home and no help or a difficult partner
- those living in areas that are not easily accessible by public transport
- those whose funds won't stretch to this, (as opposed to a couple of drinks in an easily accessible pub and leave when you want)
- people who'd like to see Fred and Betty - but wouldn't want to invite them into their home.
It comes from the mindset of someone with a nice house in an area where they have plenty of local friends (all with cars), and nice kitchens with space for "entertaining" and the money to pay for a takeaway or cooked meal for everyone.
That was - and still is - the huge gulf in understanding the real difficulties of other people. Not everybody - by a long chalk - has a solid support structure of sick pay, no childcare needs, nice house, network of local friends, supportive partner, close family, own car, secure income.
It's the same with the WFH theory. Great for rich salaried people with home offices or spare bedrooms in heated houses with nice gardens. Shit for people in flat shares with a small, cold room and dodgy wi-fi working from their bed.