[quote NearlyAlwaysInsane]@DockOTheBay
Thanks for those figures. The reality is that while covid deaths in kids are awful, the absolutely overwhelming majority of under-18s do not have any serious complications, or risk dying, from covid.
From a public health perspective, therefore, treating covid as an endemic disease that kids will build up immunity to pretty quickly makes sense. I think we are likely to see lots of covid cases in that age range this year, with rates dropping significantly in the next few school years. Additionally, the JCVI says:
'The available evidence indicates that the individual health benefits from COVID-19 vaccination are small in those aged 12 to 15 years who do not have underlying health conditions which put them at risk of severe COVID-19. The potential risks from vaccination are also small, with reports of post-vaccination myocarditis being very rare, but potentially serious and still in the process of being described. Given the rarity of these events and the limited follow-up time of children and young people with post-vaccination myocarditis, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the health risks associated with these adverse events.'
But hey, who are we to listen to the scientists, yeah? Yeah?[/quote]
We have had a reversal of plan within a relatively short time; the CMO, Health Secretary et al advising us to vaccinate our 12-15s.
So we have listened to the JCVI, we are considering their minutes, and we are having an intelligent discussion about them 
I would note that the scientists in many other countries in Europe, and also in the US, managed to approve vaccines for ages 12-15 without discussing whether they should forego vaccines and just leave the kids to get infected in school
. It is also reasonable to ask why the UK was an outlier in this respect.