The intriguing thing also is that vaccination rates in both Swale and Thanet are middle of the road at best
My hypothesis is that the vaccine is not good enough at preventing infection, but still does a job at making infection more difficult, so spread is very rapid through an unvaccinated community, and therefore you reach a level preventing further rapid spread in anyone who missed out quickly.
However the vaccine mitigates that rapid spread, but still results in spread. ie 100 people in two groups one 90% vaccinated the other 50% vaccinated, no previous exposure, let's introduce covid.
In the 50% (low) vaccinated, in the first week 90% of the unvaccinated get it and 20% of the vaccinated. So 55 infected.
In the 90% (high) vaccinated, only 27 infected.
next week 22 infected in the low group vs 15 in the high group
next week it's 8 in low group vs 12 in the high group.
So despite the vaccine working well and only 56 of the 100 infected in total, the snapshot rate in week three is higher in the more highly vaccinated group.
So highly vaccinated (with a vaccine which is relatively low percentage at preventing infection) keeps cases high. In the above of course the vulnerable people in the low vaccinated group would be a lot worse off and we'd see more serious events, but focusing purely on cases.