I find it strange when people from the U.K. criticise NZ for their strategy. The NZ strategy has avoided many deaths and my understanding is that they haven’t locked down nearly as much as the U.K?
I feel really frustrated when people say you can’t compare the U.K. with NZ due to population size and density etc. Obviously that is true, but the difference in population size / density has got very little to do with the huge difference in Covid deaths.
The U.K. simply did not act fast enough in the early days, and the transmission of Covid spiralled out of control. Our PM did not take Covid and the risks that came with it seriously at the outset - valuable time was wasted early on which led to us having to take a very different strategy.
We could have closed borders but still allowed supplies in.
We could have had a better track and trace process in place from day 1.
NZ were proactive from early on and were clear that they were not willing to accept thousands upon thousands of deaths due to Covid.
Yes they are now in a tricky situation re the vaccine and the U.K. has done exceptionally well to roll out the vaccine. But our vaccine roll our really has been our only success in all of this. NZ are in a position where they have avoided tens of hundreds of thousands of deaths and are slowly rolling out the vaccine.
They will reach the same stage as the U.K. at some point, minus the deaths.
And I’m sure at that stage they will need to rethink their strategy in terms of moving from zero Covid to living with Covid in a way that does not overwhelm services.