Just seen an interesting article by reuters
mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN29Q0OD?__twitter_impression=true
On Britain's COVID-19 frontline, medics and patients fight for life
Now we know that during the first wave there were more people over 80 who went to ICU. Now they don't because its generally felt they don't have a good chance of survival if they get to that stage.
So the following paragraphs are even more shocking in that context:
"This time around what we're finding is that patients aren't faring as well if they need to be invasively ventilated," he told Reuters.
"Our mortality probably in the first wave for patients coming onto intensive care was around 40%. This time around we find that the mortality is about 80%."
He explained that unlike in the first wave, all COVID-19 patients in the hospital now automatically receive remdesivir and dexamethasone after they were found to be effective.
That means that those who end up in ICU during the second wave of the pandemic are more likely to be the sickest patients, because they have not responded to those treatments.
Shamsuddin added that he did not know whether a highly transmissible new variant of the disease found in the UK also contributed to higher death rates.
He said intensive care staff, who have been boosted by medics and nurses from other wards during the pandemic to maintain one-on-one care, were not used to such high levels of death.
"At the moment we're just all keeping our heads down and just getting on with it," he said.
"Intensive care hospitals are meant to be a place where we treat patients and make them better. The difficulty here is that even though we try our best and we throw everything at the patients, it just doesn't seem to be working."
I would be really interested in knowing what was going on in other countries.
Those percentages are really bad.