It is incredibly frustrating for people who do not need key worker places (read: one SAHP and no vulnerabilities) to take them up.
Also, not the same situation but I have to say all the people saying “well I am a key worker but DP isn’t and he is wfh but I am sending them in anyway because it’s easier” - do you not realise that what you’re describing is the issue facing all wfh non-key workers? The provision isn’t in place to just make life easier for the parent who is wfh. Take up the place if you want to, no one can stop you, but only you can know if you’re taking the piss.
Parents who wfh but who are not key workers just have to manage, they have no other choice. So do single parents in the same position. I think I’d feel annoyed if I was one of them and knowing that key worker parents were taking up places that they didn’t absolutely need.
I completely understand it’s inconvenient but like... it is for literally every parent and what is inconvenient for us as individuals just is not the priority right now if we want a functioning health care system. We have GOT to look past our individual situation. It’s not my first choice to be going into work to teach a large group of children right now but I need to because otherwise it’s a nightmare for school, we’re understaffed and stretched as it is. That is for the greater good right now.
If your child is vulnerable or you have MH issues or there is SEN then it’s different, and of course if your job deals with safeguarding then fine. But schools genuinely may as well be open at this point because we have SO many key worker children in and I can guarantee you that they don’t all need to be.