Billions of euros, millions of faulty masks, and no answers.
4 NOV 2020 -
In the very first contract for protection equipment paid for by the EU budget, the European Commission in April signed a contract with the German company Asanus Medizintechnic GmbH worth €29m for 10 million masks.
When the first batch arrived in May tests in four member states showed the masks did not comply with the contract. They were non-homogenous, only partially passed the filter test, and fell below the norm for a fit-for-purpose test.
Asked repeatedly about the consequences for the supplier, and what happened with the total batch, the commission did not return with an answer.
The journalists found an extremely wide range of prices for coronavirus equipment. Prices for protective masks bought by governments and EU institutions varied from 20 cents, to €37 per unit.
Of the collated and analysed contracts worth a total €21bn, EU institutions signed agreements for around €3.4bn, with two major procurement contracts negotiated by the commission on behalf of the member states.
They come with a number of unanswered questions.
In April a contract worth €1.5bn was signed for ventilators with or without CE-certification – a certificate to show the product is sold in accordance with security, health, functional and environmental standards.
In an email to us, the commission explained why CE-certification was sidestepped: "As you have rightly indicated, the call for tenders on ventilators was launched in the midst of the peak outbreak in Europe.
"Therefore, to allow reaching out for additional market suppliers and increase opportunities for potentially life-saving equipment, the process included lots with and without CE-certification."
The commission stressed that it would be up to the individual governments whether to buy and use non-certified equipment or not.
The second large EU-contract was awarded to the German company GYZ GmbH, an owner-managed company in cooperation with an unnamed Chinese company.
The contract was worth €1.5bn, for googles, face-shields and masks.
To learn more about the awarded contracts and the companies behind it, requests for access to document were filed to the commission in May.
Such requests should be responded to within 15 working days, with a possible extension of up to 15 additional working days in "exceptional cases", according to the law on access to documents in EU institutions.
Five months later, after numerous emails and phone calls, the responsible office at the commission has still not responded.
How much money governments have spent all in all on personal protective equipment, medicine and medical devices is anybody's guess. The sum of €21bn only covers contracts available in the public domain.
In the EU, only Portugal, Poland, Lithuania and Slovenia published all contracts signed by public authorities.
Most countries held back information on prices paid, arguing it was necessary to preserve secrecy in order not undermine negotiations.
Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, together with non-EU Switzerland and Norway, stand out as "black holes" from where almost no information is made available.
euobserver.com/coronavirus/149898