@SueEllenMishke
I am a teacher who has worked with vulnerable families and children.
Attendance was down to below 50% in some of the most disadvantaged boroughs in the country by November. Is fully one schooling working for those children and families in the same way it is working for you?
I spent lockdown helping my school deliver food parcels and do checks on vulnerable kids. We invited them into school because we didn’t have a lot of key workers.
They got more one to one during lockdown than any other time in their schooling. This is what should be happening. Children who can learn at home should be able to do so. Children who can’t should get the support in school in safe numbers.
If you are a school governor then you should be well aware that schools know who their vulnerable kids are and have plans to support them. Unfortunately, this cannot be done if we are also expected to be providing face to face for all kids, regardless of their background.
What about your schools leavers- who will mainly be reliant on retail and hospitality jobs. Is keeping those sectors closed to allow for full time face to face helping them?
Essentially, keeping schools open FT for everyone further disadvantages the disadvantaged and benefits the children from comfortable homes.
If parents who can took some responsibility for blended learning we could focus more on the disadvantaged.
By insisting that you couldn’t possibly arrange your life any differently you are taking away support and opportunities from those kids.