1) Your primary has low number FOR NOW. And you also don’t know how many asymptomatic cases there are
True but 3 cases since September is very low and doesn't warrant full closure.
.
2) Blended learning is one week in and one week out (with work set for the week out). Why couldn’t kids access that? It requires no computers. And vulnerable kids and kids with additional needs are provided spaces in school
Great. I'll tell my work I need alternate weeks off work shall I? My 6 year old needs supervision and support. Also, that's not how all schools are approaching blended learning- we've been told they'll be using google classrooms if they shut with 'live' lessons.
3) The government are the ones who are driving this. Where are the campaigns for all the working parents of Hull and Manchester who couldn’t work because their schools were shut through infection and couldn’t work.
I live I Manchester. Not all schools have been closed or have had high rates of infections.
As I said, keeping schools open as a priority means nothing else can open. It is quite an entitled take to suggest that the people in affected sectors lose their jobs and the childless remain sequestered at home so that WFH parents don’t have to deal at all with blended learning.
Children are entitled to an education. It's important. Why do you assume parents who WFH don't want to deal with blended learning. We're working!!!! I can't work and homeschool and care for my child at the same time.
My sister has lost two jobs this year and is about to lose her house. She works in the hospitality sector.
That is dreadful. I have friends in the same position. I don't agree with the closing of the hospitality sector either. There were lots of establishments which were managing the situation well and it's a travesty they had to close.