[quote FrogToad]@christinarossetti19
Personally I'd have no issue with schools closing for Christmas a few days early. The issue though is that it would give the unions a bone.
It would soon be "Let's have remote learning" for two weeks after Christmas as well and then "oh, we've got a case in year 7, remote learning for everyone it is".
These decisions have to be made by government and the DfE, not individual heads or councils as we'd soon end up back at square one with all schools effectively closed otherwise.[/quote]
The Greenwich decision was made in consultation with PHE. It wasn't Greenwich council going rogue.
Actually, I disagree that central government are best placed to decide on the details of how schools provide learning.
The govt should mandate the bigger picture ie all children have access to the proper curriculum and support schools to achieve that as they judge would suit their unique pupil/teacher profile.
Some schools might have set up blended learning from September, supported by the laptops that the govt promised for children who don't have access at home. Or those children would have been able to use on site facilities.
The idea of a free, fast, national Broadband service doesn't seem as laughable as it did exactly a year ago does it?
If schools had more autonomy and flexibility whilst maintaining accountability, I don't think this term would have been the shitshow that it has been.
Some pupils have had multiple, multiple periods of self-isolation. They've hardly been at school and, when they have, they've been waiting to be told to SI again.
No way would any school leader not done all they could to avoid those sort of situations, if they have had the power to do so.
And give over with the union bashing. The teaching unions have virtually no power. They haven't even been able to ensure a safe work place for their members, which is literally their job.