If you have a breathing problem or a real mental health issue then ofcourse your exempt
HOW DO YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOMEONE WHO HAS A GENUINE REASON NOT TO WEAR ONE AND SOMEONE WHO DOES?
What happens to the person who quite legitimately has an exemption who walks into a shop and is either refused entry or is subjected to abuse by other members of the public because they don't have one?
The reality is that there is no exemption for even people who do have an exemption, because in practice they will be discriminated against or potentially put themselves at risk from abuse or worse, for exercising their right not to wear a mask. It will mean that many will feel they have no choice but to wear one or unable to go out in public at all. Thats not good either.
The problem with the rule is about who enforces this law too.
There has been a case in the last week of a French bus driver being assaulted and dying (after being declared brain dead and having life support switched off) after he challenged passengers trying to board his bus for not having a mask on.
People who simply don't want to wear a mask will continue not to, and the prospect of a £50 fine (which is unlikely anyway) won't be sufficient deterent. They will either bullshit they are exempted (even though they aren't) and won't care about being challenged (and my get abusive if they are). And it will be people who are exempted who will still feel compelled to wear one or be horribly embarrassed / inconvienced when they are challenged / abused for not wearing one / unable to leave the house.
Whilst I think wearing a mask should be the default, I have concerned about who will be badly affected by it being mandatory and who will just ignore it.
I have visions of the little old lady who can't afford a mask / or get a mask before the deadline / or has a genuine exemption being refused entry to a shop for food (or even to purchase a mask) and becoming very distressed / going hungry as a result whilst the big heafy 20 something meathead just strolls into Tesco unchallenged because everyone is terrified of him or he kicks off at being challenged and harms an innocent member of staff.
Which would make a mandatory policy counterproductive in terms of how it has harmful effect on those who are most vulnerable / financially disadvantaged anyway, despite its honourable intentions.
Its one of those where the UK will fail more than other countries because of the levels of our inequality and because of our social attitudes and our selfish nature and the attitude of some where they use such policies as a massive power trip which is used against easy targets.
People should really be wearing masks because they WANT TO and because they've been persuade that its the right thing to do, rather than being forced, because of the unintended consequences of failing to win the moral argument to begin with.
shrugs