For every SAGE advisor saying 'no' there'll be economic and health advisors saying another 1/2/3 weeks of lockdown will likely result in X number of job losses, X number of businesses folding, X number of people at risk of homelessness, X number of suicides, X number of poverty related deaths, X number of people needing MORE NHS care due to delays caused by CV, X number of people needing MH treatment due to CV and lockdown, X number of people dying because they cannot get the NHS treatment they need because it has an overwhelming backlog, X number of NHS services closing because despite increased need, there's no fucking money.
I work in the NHS and theres already plans being put in place to cut certain services because most trusts go over budget a few DAYS into the new financial year anyway and this year, there's additional costs of paying for shielding staff and all those staff having 7-14 days off isolating with suspected symptoms (them or their family) before testing came in and still now for days at a time till they get a negative result. That can't be helped but it costs a huge amount of money. My trust has only recently gone below 200 staff off per DAY with CV related issues, the majority of whom haven't had CV but are shielding or isolating.
It's a difficult balance to strike but it really isn't 'economy over lives', the economy IS lives.
Austerity measures a few years ago caused far more excess deaths than CV and if we thought that was bad, the result of CV and lockdown will be far, far worse.
Every week we wait for everyone to be happy 'it's safe enough' is another week which will longitudinally result in more deaths than the ones caused by CV.