I know Colchester, Chester and Twycross Zoos very well. They are all capable, IMO, of implementing social distancing measures such as restricted numbers, pre booked and timed tickets, one way systems, closure of play areas inside or out, closure of other currently unsuitable spaces or attractions such as gift shops, sit down eateries etc. I too am baffled and dismayed that they aren't being allowed to open, subject to all possible hygiene precautions being taken and terrified at the implications this could have for the fate of their animals - not 'just' from the tragic prospect of euthanasia but also from the perspective of the work they do to help conserve endangered species.
You know the situation is really bad when a huge successful zoo like Chester is teetering. I dread to think how smaller establishments, many of whom aren't even open daily except during school holidays, are faring right now.
I've wracked my brain trying to understand why there isn't yet a little light at the end of the tunnel for zoos. And no matter how hard I try can't come up with a logical reason for the delay in reopening. About the only thing that's occurred to me is that because zoos typically attract families the thinking might be that excited small kids couldn't be trusted to socially distance as they should. But on the other hand it is 'allowed' (even if frowned upon by some) to take your kids to supermarkets, IKEA, and the much smaller gardens opening up. Let alone crowded outdoor spaces like popular beaches ir seafronts. Really .... why the heck would a properly managed zoo visit be more dangerous, especially when finite numbers can be admitted, unlike Blackpool beach (for example)?
It's yet another example of government ineptitude, contrariness, and lack of common sense (ironic eh, given we're told we should be exercising ours). But one with terrible implications for thousands of animals. And all so bloody unnecessary given the other less controlled, or even uncontrolled outdoor destinations it's now okay to visit.