How does it benefit the government to deliberately trigger another lockdown? You think they are able to engineer infection rates? Amongst the demographic least likely to get Covid, primary age kids? Lockdown is costing 8 Billion per month. That's on top of an existing benefits bill, excluding pensions of 100 Billion a year. Your idea that the government is engineering infection in the group least likely to catch the virus to trigger another lockdown? That's not 'cynical.' It's laughable
Laugh away then @BovaryX
I suppose you didn't hear the government and medical officers early on when they talked of using schools as a valve to increase or decrease the rate of infection? How about ICL modelling that shows closing schools has an important role in severing contacts between households and lowering transmission rates. So opening schools does the opposite?
Despite your sneering tone, I do not expect schools to stay closed and us all to be locked down forever.
I do however want someone to explain why social distancing guidelines (wear a mask in enclosed spaces, keep 2m apart from anyone, don't meet more than one other person in the outdoors ) just magically don't apply in schools?
Yes other workers are still in contact with the public. Most of them have PPE, increased cleaning and hygiene practises and most importantly are dealing with adults who understand the rules.
Children will not (and should not) follow social distancing rules. And that was acknowledged by the government in their guidance to schools. The evidence on children not carrying or spreading the virus is patchy.
So HOW is this not about increasing the spread?