. Interestingly, the viral load of HCoV-NL63 in patients with a coinfection is significantly lower than the load in singly infected HCoV-NL63 patients ( Chiu, 2005 ; van der Hoek, 2005 ). The reduced viral load may be caused by direct competition for the same target cell in the respiratory tissues. Alternatively, the innate immune response triggered by one respiratory virus may inhibit replication of HCoV-NL63. It is also likely that an initial HCoV-NL63 infection may set the stage for a subsequent infection with another respiratory virus, and at the time that this second virus is causing symptoms, the HCoV-NL63 infection may already be under the control of the immune system. Double infections are more often observed in hospitalized patients vs. outpatients ( van der Hoek, 2005 ), suggesting that patients with a codetected respiratory virus have a more severe disease or a worse long-term prognosis than patients with a single HCoV-NL63 infection. However, further studies are required to confirm these trends.
Viral shedding
In the course of a coronavirus infection the virus can be shed for a long period. For instance, some cats infected with FIPV (feline infectious peritonitis virus) can continue to shed the virus in faeces for months ( Herrewegh, 1997 ) and the duration of SARS-CoV excretion in faeces is also up to a few months ( Liu, 2004 ). The duration of SARS-CoV excretion in sputa was on average a few weeks, but could for some persons extend to almost 2 months ( Liu, 2004 ). For HCoV-NL63 the situation does not seem very different. Three weeks after an initial HCoV-NL63 infection the virus is still detectable in respiratory specimens in 50% of the infected children. At this time all children are free of symptoms ( Kaiser, 2005 )
It's a different virus but similar and poses an explanation for why that boy managed not to infect anyone when he had i think 172 contacts - thry said he also had another virus.