In the lancet though only a 1/4 tested positive and a further 3 had exposure. 3 out of 8 were negative with no known exposure which is odd.
Unless we get quite a lot of false negatives which means that are numbers of people who have it must be high.
I think the fact that London and New York are showing high numbers must be significant.
Partly because one suspects of the numbers of children who have had it in these areas (which means that it is still rare) and the socio economic make up of it
I have a friend who works at the hospital in London where the cases are and they said they all respond very well to treatment and early treatment is key. This shouldnt be a killer if treatment is given early and the right care.
I wonder if the above is why New York is showing more fatalities from this a lack of health insurance means later care