I agree that this has been a most dishonest way of dealing with the virus - one that has tried to push the responsibility for people's lives onto anyone but the government.
First of all, it was the scientists who were in the firing line because every policy announcement was prefaced by the comment that it was on "scientific advice". So, if the whole thing blew up in this government's face they could blame the scientists.
Then, it was the general public being told that if they stepped foot outside the front door they would, in effect, be responsible for the deaths of other people.
The government waited too long to lock down, it ignored several previous dire warnings about insufficient PPE stock and existing stock being years out of date, it took no account of the very high risk of contagion in homes for elderly or disabled people, it lacked a cohesive strategy for testing, contact tracing and quarantining - especially for people entering the country- etc, etc, etc. As for the PM's personal contribution to all this, that is already well documented.
Now, despite the fact that even in the open air we have been instructed to keep 2 metres away from other people (which, conveniently, they now say is probably not so vital), the government is telling those who can't work from home to return to work. And that social distancing should be maintained "where possible". Surely including that "where possible" comment leaves the door wide open for employers to just say it isn't possible. And who is supposed to monitor working conditions at this time?
So far as I am aware, no special arrangements have been drawn up to control the flow and distribution of people onto public transport. The PM suggests people might drive, walk or cycle to work rather than use public transport. I live in one of the outer boroughs of London and used to work in central London - about 8 miles away. Many of the people who work in Central London (and other large cities) have to commute to get there. Is it really feasible that large numbers of people would be fit enough or confident enough to cycle some distance through heavy traffic and in all sorts of weather? If they drive, will they be liable for the congestion charge and where will they park?
As for VE Day, it was fairly obvious that, following some very heavy hints that restrictions were likely to be lifted, people would be encouraged to throw caution to the wind and become less careful about social distancing. All the breathless accounts on the TV and in the press, of anticipated celebrations - fly pasts, Vera Lynn, Katherine Jenkins, community singing, etc, etc. - definitely encouraged an atmosphere of excitement and celebration, which was hardly appropriate while in the middle of a serious pandemic that has already claimed thousands of lives..