Sadly it is what it is - furlough is unsustainable and some people just want to take government money to sit at home where actually their job is very low risk. We have gone from a situation in which people are not concerned enough about social distancing to one where they are too concerned. I think that the government should have encouraged office workers to work from home 4 weeks earlier and then had looser restrictions on other things - more like Sweden - and focused attention on measures in care homes and for the vulnerable etc (where Sweden's excess deaths are - the young population that are moving relatively normally are unscathed and their excess deaths are really only in the care sector).
Case in point - nannies. If parents are wfh, social distancing from others (ie only one supermarket shop per week and daily exercise), washing hands regularly and giving nanny space (from them, not kids) in common spaces, then risk is extremely extremely low. But on here people are campaigning for people to let their nannies sit at home on furlough money, which actually means middle class people claiming state support for costs that they should be paying. It is immoral to be honest - either you reduce your nanny's risk so far as possible and she comes in or you (not the state) pays her. Anything else is unethical profiteering that the country cannot afford.
Equally I saw on here that one woman would not get her toilet fixed because she had another one in her house. Totally ridiculous. It is entirely possible to have a workman in the house 2m from others, leave the toilet a couple of days and then give everything a good scrub before using it. People have gone mad and expect the government to pay out to reduce even minuscule levels of risk.