
@Xenia We need to push to get it lifted on 11 May then as otherwise in my view it breaches human rights and should just be voluntary. We are damaging the lives of 60m to save a relatively few (even if 40,000 die in the first wave) many of whom are likely to die anyway as very old or sick. This is not the greater good. This times a million. Every time the death figures are mentioned, they always omit one thing: it's people who died with CV, not people who died of CV.
I'm sighing at what I believe is certain: the lockdown is going to do far, far more damage than the virus itself, yet many people are baying for more restrictions. Very bad recession on the way. How readily and willingly we are sleepwalking into an oppressive self-destruction. Yes, I know I'm in the minority on MN for thinking this. (Don't bother with "what's the alternative?".)
It's really depressing the way that just about everything has shut down, with a few exceptions. If it was just one sector, such as air travel, I could handle that. I find the week just after Christmas bad enough to handle: this feels like an extended version of that, with no end in sight.
I want my sport back, which is probably going to be one of the last things allowed back. There's going to be a huge obesity and mental health crisis before this is over. And I won't be at all surprised if there is large scale civil unrest, when the public has finally had enough, which I am pretty sure will happen, if the politicians play it too safe.
And I wish, I wish, I wish that people would stop using the word "indefinitely", which seems to have replaced "unprecedented". Indefinitely: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!
