the problem with it is that once again it is leaving way too much of the decision making up to individuals and expecting them to behave responsibly. So for example it dose say:
"If children can stay safely at home, they should, to limit the chance of the virus spreading."
"schools to remain open only for those children who absolutely need to attend."
"If it is at all possible for children to be at home, then they should be."
but what people will do is immediately check the list, see they are on it and assume therefor their child will go to school. Which may indeed need to be the case, but actually if you are a keyworker and there is a second parent in the home who isnt and maybe can work form home then really the child could stay at home. yes it will be shit, yes it will be really hard for the second parent to get any work done, but the child could be safe at home.
Additionally I have heard from someone who is a nurse (single parent) that she intends sending her 14 and 16 yr old in to school. Really? They really couldn't be left safely at home at those ages? It may not be what you would choose to do ideally, it may not be what you would do in a school holiday but seriously - they wouldnt be safe at home in these dire circumstances?
I am a doctor, DH is a teacher. We could send our kids to school but wont be doing. We will have 17yr old, 14yr old 13yr old and 12 yr old school age kids. It wont be ideal The will probably bicker all day, they may not get any school work done, they will no doubt make bloody chaos all over the house, but at the end of the day they will be safe and I have no reason to add to to the burden on teachers right now by sending them. Not to mention the postential for them to spread infection.They will just need to accept that and try to behave as reasonably as they can. (although of course this is hard for them too.)
I really hope people will be senisble about this, but recent behaviour (stockpiling, people still going to the pub ect) suggests otherwise.