I completely get why this is such a strong emotional issue, and I don’t blame anyone for reacting with horror to anything that seems like it might signal support for a terrorist group especially one with such a violent history.
Just to clarify, I don’t support Hezbollah, and I wasn’t trying to excuse or downplay the gravity of their actions or of Nasrallah’s legacy. My point was more about trying to understand what might have motivated someone like Hickey, who has consistently spoken out about justice, to be there. I’m not saying it was wise or right far from it but I do think it’s possible for people to make seriously flawed decisions without them necessarily aligning with every aspect of what an event represents.
He may well have believed he was attending in solidarity with Palestinians rather than in support of Hezbollah, and I suspect he underestimated (or misunderstood) how it would be perceived. That doesn’t make it OK but it might not mean he’s a “bad person” in the all-encompassing sense either.
History is also complicated. Plenty of people who were once labelled as terrorists have later become respected political leaders Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela are two clear examples. That doesn’t mean all violent movements are equivalent or excusable, but it does suggest that not everything is as black and white as it might first appear.
I totally respect that others will see it differently, and I appreciate you taking the time to respond even if we land in very different places on this.
Any way we deflect back to the topic under dicussion.