Opk, would you say this is positive??

[Misskg1982]

First time using opks and first time getting a line. Been trying for baby no 2 for 7 months (fell after 3mnths with dd) so this month thought I'd give these a go. Is this dark enough or does it need to be darker for a positive??

It's nearly there. Test a couple of times a day starting mid afternoon and hopefully you will catch your surge

No, need to be as dark or darker, but it is close, I would start dtd the over the next couple of days, probably get a peak tomorrow or Sunday, test again tonight see if it's got darker. X

As dark or darker than the control line**

Hi all, similar question please...!

I’ve attached my OPKs so far this month (today being CD17).. CD15 is definitely the darkest, but not quite positive, so I was expecting a peak either yesterday or today. However they’re just getting lighter as you can see in the pictures.

I’m now wondering whether I missed my peak (by not testing at the right time) on CD15. What do you think?

I track BBT and have done for 2 years now (although this is only month 2 of TTC). I’ve attached my chart too and the 3 high temps would maybe suggest ovulation either yesterday or today.

Would be helpful to hear what you think, so that I can change the CD15 OPK result to positive on natural cycles if that’s the most likely day / circumstance. Annoyingly I had to discard today’s temperature as I temped 2 hours earlier than normal due to being up for work at 5am!

Thanks in advance for any help and good luck in your own TTC journeys!! :)

Cd 15 looks pretty gd, it shouldn't have scored that low i wouldn't think x

Here's my peak

Your cd test looks fuzzy, and look like it been took from further away, that might have something to do with it

Thanks so much for your response!

It definitely wasn’t darker than the control line, but was pretty close. Yes agree it should have scored higher!

Do you think I should record as a positive OPK on Natural Cycles?

I think you should, it's the Darkest you had this month. If think the light/distance may have given it a wrong reading.