DS had been having a number of tests done because of repeat chest infections. He had a ct scan last week and as a result the consultant has recommended we do two tests. One involves brushing the inside of his nose to see if the hairs are working. The other is a broncospy which is done under a general anaesthetic. He recommended this course of action but said we could wait and see what happens.
My inclination is to do the tests. Although I obviously don't want DS to be put through unnecessary procedures, and I appreciate there is a chance we will find nothing, I feel he is the consultant and we should follow his advice. Given his history I do not really see the point in waiting for him to have another infection before we proceed as that causes him suffering too and could end up permanently damaging his lungs. Dh disagrees.
Any thoughts wise mumsnetters?