Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Mums with circumcised boys

245 replies

WaitTillFebruary · 27/12/2014 14:06

Hi,
I'm due in the second week of February and am expecting a baby boy. This will be our second boy and my husband and I have decided to have him circumcised as soon as possible after he is born.
We have gathered that circumcision is not available in the NHS unless for medical reasons. This leaves us going down the private route, which is a path we are unfamiliar with.
Does anyone have any advice as to where one can go (preferably in London) to have one's newborn baby boy circumcised privately?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
GraysAnalogy · 27/12/2014 19:30

So is the removal of the clitoral hood comparable then strictly? Or is that not mutilation either?

When you start making ridiculous arguments like that you're on very shaky ground. Mutilation isn't to do with the size of the body part.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 19:31

Yes - at home, without anaesthetic, just the way a baby should be mutilated.

X

HermioneWeasley · 27/12/2014 19:32

If believing that babies shouldn't be permanently mutilated so their parents can appease an angry sky god makes me "a rabid anti circumcision fanatic" then I guess I am.

And I come from a family where all the men are circumcised and happy to be so.

It's medieval and should be illegal (though much good that's done to stop FGM)

Strictlyison · 27/12/2014 19:37

Oh well, shaky grounds maybe, but I am very unconvinced with the argument that cutting someone's arm, leg, clitoris, little finger, toes, ear, is to be viewed as the same as removal of foreskin. I don't think it should be done for non-medical reasons, in my opinion, but I would never use the emotionally charged terms that you are using here. I think that your argument and emotions are not constructive at all.

GraysAnalogy · 27/12/2014 19:41

Why? Why is the removal of foreskin different to cutting someone's clitoris, finger, toes ear..? Why? Especially the clitoral hood because it's the same tissues, in the same area.

It's different in your mind because you want it to be. Because you don't want to think you're mutilating your child.

Mrwillywonkasbitch · 27/12/2014 19:41

Don't do it, I once got off with a bloke who had it done, didn't know what to do with it, have you ever tried wanking off a bloke with no foreskin? It's urm different, think of his future!!

BackOnlyBriefly · 27/12/2014 19:44

Strictlyison how big a part does it have to be before it counts? Where do you stand on FGM?

BackOnlyBriefly · 27/12/2014 19:45

Cross posted, but how do you justify one and not the other?

GraysAnalogy · 27/12/2014 19:45

In fairness mrwilly I don't really think a parent wants to think of their unborn child being wanked off...

That said I wouldn't want to think of mine having his penis cut into either.

fluffling · 27/12/2014 19:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Hannah5pillars · 27/12/2014 19:46

There is a clinic that does it for religious, health or other reasons. It has been proved done properly, to help keep the boy clean from infections and good for other medical reasons. My son had it done at about 2 years old, they give medication and he was walking and happy next day. It cost £200, cost of operation, painkillers and hospital stay. Older son had it done later and had quite a few urine infections and problems before the circumcision.I believe it is a good thing. The highest price is £270 I found.

WhyYouGottaBeSoRude · 27/12/2014 19:50

I am very unconvinced with the argument that cutting someone's arm, leg, clitoris, little finger, toes, ear, is to be viewed as the same as removal of foreskin

Can you explain what the difderence is between removing a foreskin and a clitoris/arm/leg/ear/toe?

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 19:53

Watching with interest to see how the non-medical removal of foreskin can be justified

Azquilith · 27/12/2014 19:57

Wow. Know nothing about this but just googled and found a lovely US site which suggested that anaesthetic wasn't really necessary and a pacifier dipped in sugar water helped with the pain. Am glad I'll be letting my son keep all his knob. Mind you I suppose I am struggling to cut his hair.

MagnificentMalificent · 27/12/2014 20:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 20:03

Yep. Wine is also used - some kind of special, religious wine which stops the pain, if you are easily fooled.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 20:04

Of course Malificent. How could I have forgotten? Confused

BackOnlyBriefly · 27/12/2014 20:05

anaesthetic wasn't really necessary

You can just see the priest saying "I cut loads of babies and I never felt a thing"

MagnificentMalificent · 27/12/2014 20:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 20:09

It was probably just coincidence that the babies cried at the point they were being mutilated without proper anaesthetic. Babies cry all the time, after all.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 20:11

those were actually some of the reasons my BIL gave to my sister when he wanted their son circumcised

You are fucking kidding?? Shock

slippermaiden · 27/12/2014 20:12

Azquilith just for interest, I work in a special care baby unit and we do give a sugar solution (sucrose) for pain relief, and it really works when the babies are having painful procedures such as blood taking, lumbar punctures etc.

fluffling · 27/12/2014 20:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

fluffling · 27/12/2014 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SirChenjin · 27/12/2014 20:15

But not amputation, right, slippery? It's not that good for pain relief, is it?