Morning Ladies,
I've also posted some comments on another thread which is here:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/childbirth/981790-VBAC-Any-book-recommendations
There is some tips about good books to read and for your birthing partner.
I totally agree with Mitfordsisters about waiting. When I look back at my second section I know that if I had waited until things had got started I could have been OK. But my waters broke and that had never happened to me before . This was my fourth child and they normally break my waters for me and then 10 mins after baby comes so I panicked and went to the hospital without even having any contractions. Being it was my second section I was strapped to the bed and then when the baby became distressed. I was whisked off to theatre.
pinkgrapefruitjuice I totally understand they give you the stats that makes you think you are putting you and your baby in danger.
Here are some figures from the cotzias study (1999) for still borns
At 35 weeks 1:500
36 1:556
37 1:645
38 1:730
39 1:840
40 1:926
41 1:826
42 1:769
43 1:633
You have a greater risk at 35-37 weeks of having a still born than you do at 41-43.
Are they advising you to deliver at 35-37 when you have a higher risk of having a still born at theses dates than waiting???
Flip it around, you have a good chance of being 1 of the 825 women to have a health baby at 41 weeks and or 1 of the 768 women who have a healthy baby at 42 weeks.
Chance of scar tissue rupture is 0.5%
Scar tissue rupture 1:200
Placental abruption 1:100
Cord prolapse 1:100
Placenta praevia 1:200
So you have more chance of having a cord prolapse or Placental abruption before having your scar tissue rupture did they warn you about that? No! I believe it's because they believe you have such a small chance of it happening so why mention it.
Also your chance of placental praevia increases with the more caesareans you have.
When they tell you about the repeat section do they tell you that it increases your chances of you needing an emergancy hysterectomy (removal of your uterus)
The risk of infection, hemorrhage, embolism (blood clots in circulation), damage to the bowel or bladder. Also postnatal depression and post traumatic stress disorder.
The rate of maternal death associated with caesarean section is 4:10 000
The rate in Vaginal is 1:10 000
Sorry I hate to go on but they will show you the rates that suits what they want.
I don't believe that doctors want to just keep cutting us but I do think that some of them live by the text books and that is it.
We have to be the ones to make a stand to say we are not text book people, we are individuals and only we can change the figures and stats by going against the text books and doing what is really right for our bodies and babies.
Has any one gone against doctors advise and had a good experience?
I bet all the 70% VBAC's went against doctors advice and had a good experience.
When I moved abroad and was pregnant with my 5th child I was told no-one in the country would deliver me vaginally after 2 sections. I went against their advise and found someone who would and had her vaginally. Even though her head was titled. The confident doctor tilted it with a contraction without any problems.
I hope you all find the strength and support, to have the VBAC that you deserve.
Enjoy your day.