I had DD1 in hospital, it was a dreadful experience, so I decided to have DD2 at home. Birth is never pleasant, let's be honest, but DD2's birth was about as good as a birth can be, even though she was back-to-back. People say I was brave to have her at home, but I reckon folks who trust themselves to understaffed hospitals are the ones who are brave.
What a shame people aren't more aware of the facts and how safe a homebirth really is. The comments on that article, especially those about women who hb selfishly putting comfort before baby's safety, made me very sad.
DH was finally convinced hb was the way to go by the argument that things don't usually go wrong all at once during labour - there's plenty of warning that you might need a CS, and it takes just as long to get the theatre set up/find a surgeon etc whether you're in hospital or at home, and by the time the ambulance gets you there, they should just about be ready for you. The term 'emergecy' CS is a bit of a misnomer since you don't get operated on within 2 minutes of the decision being made!
HB is wonderful and I wish more people knew the benefits and how low the risks are.